Comparison of Missile Parameters & Improved Tracking on the Minimap!

[ILuvAnneHathaway]

Neat

[Dontkev-psn]

@Stona_WT

More information on the minimap

In the previous major update, we added a minimap tracking feature for launched aircraft ordnance in air battles. After launching guided and unguided missiles, dropping bombs or other munitions, you could see their indicators on the minimap (default key: M), and you could also navigate to the selected ordnance in flight to track it closely (default key: U). Now, left-clicking on a projectile’s indicator will also display its name and current velocity!

Now we only need it for SAMs like IRIS-T SLS/SLM, CLAWS, etc

[baotho58]

Can I ask what the music from the test video is called? It’s so peak

[CharAznable3]

More information is best information even if 99% of people don’t use it.

Though data does not make the best Missile pilots and how they use them do.

[30x170_APDS-T]

I like teasing but now it’s too much, drop that trailer for the update it’s the only thing I’m waiting for (and the end of my exams)

[AblativeKitten]

I stand corrected lmao

not a CVRT though

[genises1o]

Can this be used to bugreport?

[CamVPro]

Nice addition to the game Gaijin, thanks

[Code_649]

@genises1o

Can this be used to bugreport?

Highly doubt it. Too many unknowns

[Nostalgistic]

Great! Are there any news or updates on the new user interface that would show individual aircraft flight performance, engine performance, and weight data for use in bug reports?

You guys have mentioned this several CM Disclosures ago, but it is still not implemented yet:

@magazine2

We’ll start with the easiest to implement, and then gradually add similar features for other areas. First up will be more detailed data on armor penetration and shell ballistics. Next, we’ll likely try to implement useful information on the properties of guided missiles and aircraft flight models. However, this will take quite some time as we work on designing and implementing a mechanism (as mentioned above), so please don’t expect it in the near future.

[genises1o]

? its an offical tool from gaijin, if we can use Tac view why wouldnt we be allowed this. Also what unknowns?

[Morvran]

Looks good.

[F-16D_Barak_II]

Really nice

[AydanL44_Hunter]

Right? Honestly if not for the vehicles this update is at least good for the “rest”: maneuver kills, improved x-rays, now this…

[Morvran]

Yeah, just need some long overdue improvements to the UI (especially with configurability) and it would be really solid QoL update

[MessyFingers]

Is there anyway to change the units of measurement for this screen?

[AydanL44_Hunter]

Wtf is a mileeeeee
loud european patriot noises

[Kanelikainalo-psn]

@Stona_WT

Comparison of missiles

Recently, we added a ballistic comparison interface

We still can’t compare Pantsir SM-SV missiles.
Is that just so we won’t see how absolutely broken the 95Ya6M is or what?

[Schindibee]

@MessyFingers

Is there anyway to change the units of measurement for this screen?

This, very much. It’s ok for distance units to follow the client unit settings, but what really isn’t practical to use is the speed of the aircraft in m/s: Those should also be km/h or know, respectively.

OR - even better, allow every unit to be configured…

Also, it would be great if we could somehow export the data which is displayed, e.g. in the form of a csv table, for additional analysis for nerds like me who want to create additional graphs and stuff.

[Schindibee]

…and a last wish: also include unguided bombs to the weapon selection.