I’ve also seen a few people in this thread advocate for the removal of the ROC line from the chinese tree, in favour of It becoming an american sub tree.
This Is, in my opinion, a completely non sensical idea
9 Likes
“China should be removed from China, and China should be made a sub-tree despite it making up half of the Chinese tech tree.”
It really is a wild take.
7 Likes
Not when 60 plus percent of their tree is from two other nations already in game. “Taiwan should be removed from China and made into a sub-tree despite making up most of the Chinese tech tree. Let us not gloss over or dismiss current events regarding the relationship between the two”. Doesn’t sound so unreasonable at all.
Edit: Just know this is all going to be hidden or deleted when the CMs wake up or a certain Moderator does. It is what it is I guess.
I agree with that. It should. I know it won’t because Gaijin has staked their position but I can agree and echo those who saying it should be moved.
M18, M3A3, M5A1, M24, Chi-Ha, Chi-Ha Kai, M48A1, M42, M8 HMC, M10 GMC, M36 GMC, Ki-27, K-43, P-40E-1, P-51D-20, P-47D-30, F-86 x2, F-104A, F-5E, I-15, I-16 x2, I-153, Ki-44, Ki-61, Hs 123, F-84, SB 2M, B-25, P1Y1, PB4Y, A6M2, Ki-84, OH-58, M113 TOW, and M55.
37 out of 81 vehicles are allegedly copy-paste, that is 45%.
RO China has an excellent relationship with itself as well.
There’s no non-malicious reason to support the removal of a China from the Chinese tech tree.
Air is always the first tree to be added, ground comes later.
However, we’ve already been told that Korea being a tech tree is just a possibility, not that it is confirmed
1 Like
Taiwan needs the Abrams, and Japan needs the VT4, according to the vote.
1 Like
I wouldn’t mind that as long as we still see the Taiwanese tech tree with it special and unique vehicles. Including the Abrams T
I’m sure they will readd them into some kind of Eastern European TT maybe with Poland as the “host” of the tree and hide from research in the USSR TT, as it was with first Italian planes in the German TT. Argentinean TAMs probably as well will be readded if we get some kind of LATAM TT, while their place will be taken by Swiss vehicles.
I mean if they are going to add United Korean TT, the future addition of Eastern European TT is unquestionable.
USSR also doesn’t need any longform gapfillers from WP nations, since there is a plenty of stuff from Russia and other former Soviet Republics.
1 Like
Yeah, but hopefully they won’t throw copypaste NATO donations there.
Greece and Cyprus would bring almost nothing but Copy-paste content to an already mostly copy and paste tech-tree. It should have been Turkey and Singapore, at least they have a modern indigenous MIC but Greece and Cyprus have almost always bought their military equipment from other nations, we have always had decals and camos for people who want to larp, but tech trees and sub trees should always be around nations with indigenous military industries that make new or heavily modified vehicles.
Have they not learnt from Italy? did bloating it with c&p made it any more popular??
Come on Gaijin, if we’re going to copy-paste top tier tanks can we at least do it properly? Something like this would be great. The US can still keep the M1A1 AIM and Merkava’s, just put them in the appropriate trees for those players. Same with Germany, just keep those Canadian Leopards there and copy-paste them into the British tree.
Add the Thai V4 into their sub-tree and then the Taiwan Abrams into theirs.
1 Like
You missed the AH-1W, F-16, and Mirage
2 Likes
Just the Mirage.
F-16A MLU was in no other tech trees on addition, and potentially still is.
China’s AH-1W is in no other tech trees. America’s is different.
Still close enough to the American ADF, and what’s so different between the AH-1W? they are both still AH-1W
1 Like
Different 3D models, which is not only just different research for how it looks.
And the F-16A ADF has a different cockpit, countermeasures, radar, ordnance, general 3D model, and stopping method.
They made the ADF have the v3 too iirc. Both use AIM-120 and 9L. Cockpit isnt a very big difference and mostly doesn’t matter. CM count I’ll give you, but it’s still very much an F-16 and easily close enough to count
Thanks for admitting it’s not copy-paste.
No, but Japan should get the thai vt-4
I am afriad that will only happen in your dreams. Also, you seem very ignorant about indigenous Korean vehicles.