well one being rn as an event reward. Why do you need such a bad autocannon anyway? 2A42 is a great cannon by all means, and those 30mils Bushmasters are pretty much useless
1 Like
Hopefully the long awaited J10C Is getting added (should’ve got added much earlier but Better late than never)
Hopefully JF-17 block 3 Will be One of these
3 Likes
such a boring desicion. Give more abrams to country with abrams.
prolly will be moved to korean tree as they will introduce it, so if you want it fo China - go ahead asap
made the upgrade of MiG-21BIS*
and no, they just did the modification on place - all the design work was made by MIG themselves.
1 Like
tru. add the several vehicles to USSR, no need for separate tree
Abrams to China?
I really disagree with this decision like how I disagree with the VT-4 going to Japan. It was good that the VT-4 decision was canceled, but why do something like this again with the Abrams? Just like how China and Japan are geopolitical rivals, the US and China are too.
At this point Russia might as well get an Abrams too because Iraq/Egypt operate it.
And the US could get every MiG from 15 to 29, almost every T-series tank up to the T-90, and attack helicopters like the Mi-24 since the US has captured, traded for, or has allies that operate them all.
Obvious anti-Taiwan ragebait is obvious.
Mona Lisa sleeping in a comfy bed.
Mona Lisa going to war.
Get Heshed: “These are literally the same picture. Copy-paste slop.”
Stop with those terrible art analogies. Tanks aren’t art. If you really care about their slightly difference appearance so much, just customize the standard version with camouflages, decorations and decals.
You have a plenty of them to use and many more are to come in the future. This way you can have your suoer unqiue German M55 in american tree without ruining the game for anyone else
1 Like
There you go arguing that player choice and pro-player decisions ruin games.
Also USA isn’t Germany.
I want to use the German M55, not the American one. Because the German one can be used with Hummel in the future as well as other vehicles.
And video games are art. 3D models are objectively art.
1 Like
I like how this discussion went from “yay a bomber mosquito” to “why give Israel Greece and Cyprus?” to general subtree discussion to a debate about wether or not Taiwan is an independent country, classic forums.
1 Like
@Get_HeshED
No one assigned you words, literally zero. The word “implied” means your post via the rules of the logic transferred to another group, and the word was used to describe your post, not you.
Leopard 2A5 onward and 2A7HU have identical gameplay according to one of your previous posts. That implies gameplay is the primary factor to you for determining if things are copy-paste.
And that implication further implies that M1A1 and Leclerc are the same because their armor, mobility, ammo, and gameplay are all over 95% similar.
However, your post did try to gaslight me by accusing me of being mentally unwell. Accusations of mental illness is the lowest form of gaslighting.
@Milashny_Koteyka
Grind is secondary, and buying is entirely optional.
Producing unique vehicles takes at least as much time and money in research as researching a vehicle that will result in copy-pasted 3D model, and it’s the same work in camo commissioning for unique and copy-paste vehicles.
The ONLY thing that’s cheaper is the 3D modeler’s time, that’s it. Everything else is the same to more cost.
Copy-paste is less than 5% of vehicles in War Thunder.
try to say it`s not the reason you are here :3
Thy its only natural to move on when the theme of the talk became empty
1 Like
Doubt it pretty much as AT LEAST 80% of the top tier (ranks 6+) aviation is either US or USSR copy-paste machinery.
And all the “add 3 PzH 5 M44 5 M55 5 Mosquitoes 4 Leopards” ect ect ect.
And even 3d modeller`s time might get used as for example those new Leopard 2s have their own detailing, still being a clone of leopard 2a4, like the Christian 2 or the new french premium leopard.
Still does not make much sense to defend them as they dont bring anything new to the game.
The cheaper part is exactly the research work of the dev - you dont need to do new research when you add JUST leo 2a4 with different skin, JUST f15 with different skin AND the armanment that is already ingame on a different plane, ect ect ect. Plus you save that time which should be spent on research for the new unique tanks that could be added instead of the 3rd, 4th, 5th M55.
So i dont get your point with that message. Copy-paste machines make trees less unique, making the player`s choice less valuable and excluding the vehichels that player MIGHT want to choose from the game. And also letting the game developer to do this cruel things to cut costs.
2 Likes
Top tier? 12.0?
I don’t think there’s a single copy-paste 12.0 in War Thunder.
A Dutch friend made it very evident that all 2A6s are unique.
And no, I don’t save time with less vehicles. I need 6 vehicles to go to the next rank regardless.
I spend the same amount of time whether there are more vehicles or not.
What tech tree can I use M44, Chi Nu II, Chi To, and M24?
What tech tree can I use a Leopard 2A4 with an Ariete prototype? Certainly not Germany.
I’m glad War Thunder gives me the player more control and options.
1 Like
I specified what i ment by that, and if you want to go that way, its 13.7 now. And yes, they have several same F-16s and F-15s as much as MIG-29s.
i dount know what that supposed to mean
Neither and should not be either
Italy, and should not be either
Takes away his right to decide which he wants to play, making his experience smoothed throughout most of the game. Whichever you choose - you end up with the same machinery to use.
It may look good for a newbie to touch more stuff at the same tree, but it does ruin experience for anyone who lays the game more than two hundred hours.
2 Likes
There will always be a disconnect with people living in the De Jure world vs the De Facto.
I think your translation is broken, sir. Maybe instead of using Google Translate, using AI will be better option.
1 Like
I see that the moderators are watching… Anyway, controversial ideas always spark heated discussions.
2 Likes