we dont talk abt indian vehicles for the uk 🤫
1 Like
Yes and no. One of the ways to incentivise players to try out different trees would be to reduce the grind, for example. That also includes an element of risk, because maybe people won’t do what you expect. The important thing for populating lobbies is how long you spend in game. Whether you’re spending it playing one tree or five different trees is secondary.
Eh, I’m not sure. For example, since a lot of people have a fixation with reaching top tier, the current system incentivises the purchase of very expensive top tier premiums to skip grinding a tech tree altogether.
The thing we need to keep in mind for “sobriety” is that even when tech trees were unique, most players tended to focus on one or two. So uniqueness alone is not enough to change that tbh.
To be clear I would much rather have a system where we have max 4 or 5 separate multi-national tech trees that are each unique in flavour. But if we want to understand why we’re in this situation instead we have to analyse the decision-making process and the obstacles, unfortunately.
1 Like
They’re all 8.0 vehicles
Witch like I said Apc and similar vehicles should have scouting/drones or artillery available to them if they don’t then they should get them. Those apc’s relay on teamwork really
Witch most apc have 4-5 crew members
God I hope so with how much money went to making the Bradly a replacement for m113
Like I said theirs trade offs the apc get stronger missiles and is a good hull down vehicles the Bradly has a deployment time to use its tow missile witch have less pen also its a bigger target compared to a apc btw m113 have the same amount of armor that a Bradly hull armor has. At most I see the br moving to 8.7 like the bmp2 but not any higher do to the m3a3.
Thats so may amazing things to war thunder! lets see if we could get the Trophy APS fixed after 10 months that its first report was accepted
2 Likes
turo also for land units?
Fact!
1 Like
We have enough 30mm autocannons in the game already…
Sure, for Israel, but not for Britain.
It really should be a seperate tech tree though, considering how many vehicles they operate.
Reconnaissance/“light” Tank. Its the replacement for FV107 Scimitar
Either you put all Commonwealth nations into the same tree or you keep it the way it is.
Having Commonwealth nations in other trees while also having a dedicated Commonwealth tree just creates new issues.
thanks to ATATÜRK we have strong and beatufil looking tanks
1 Like
You’re right, we don’t talk about Indian vehicles (Tejas, Kiran, Yashas, Abhay, Arjun, Kestrel, Zorawar, Prachand, Rudra, etc), we only ever talk about French and Soviet/Russian vehicles operated by India.
1 Like
More
No, give the modern 76mm and 90mm guns some time in the limelight
If national militaries are all that matters, it shouldn’t be a problem for them to remove every non-operational vehicle from the game, since they aren’t really a part of a countries active military.
They can be added to but more 30mm
Im glad as a Greek to see my country finally get added to war thunder. Even though Cyprus has some good relations with Isreal it’s logical to add it there but for Greece relations with Italy are better and it fits since some tanks include greek skins. But Italy has already a sub-tech tree. I would recomend add both Cyprus and Greece as a minor nation. Or make a new tech tree focusing on all balkan nations because I see it kinda fair and Im sure other people want their nation in the game.
Fine, but no more RARDENs for Britain
Alright you get another warrior for that comment