Lata time I checked it wasn’t the China mains it was the Chinese players that didn’t want the VT4 in Japan
1 Like
meanwhile germany isnt allowed to have their export only stuff
cough cough KF-41
I can’t understand why Germany didn’t get the Linux(yea I know it’s not the exact same name it’s something similar) like why not? Germany has only the puma above 11.0 in light tanks and it’s nothing hard to do from the development because it’s already in game
Lynx
1 Like
Reread the statement:
“In the next major update, we won’t be adding a VT-4 to the Thailand sub tree. Other vehicles are planned to come to this branch in this update”
Notice how the wording is focused on “this update.”
Smin’s statement here only denied the VT-4 for the Tusk Force major update, and does not exclude it from future updates. Whether it will wait for 2.51 or later is anyone’s guess.
4 Likes
i know. He said it in the screenshot already
OK? You were saying that the Thai VT-4 was “cancelled,” I was pointing out that it’s likely just being held for later when the controversy dies down.
1 Like
never said it was cancelled forever. So we get the abrams then the Vt4?
1 Like
That’s my guess. But it is just a guess.
1 Like
With all of these complaints about subtrees and what should go to where, perhaps that is a signal that subtrees were a bit of a bad idea, hm? South Africa to UK and Finland to Sweden were a bit of a stretch. Then East and West germany and ROC and PRC together were big stretches, but then India, Romania, Hungary, Thailand, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and soon Greece?? Its all way too much and Gaijin could easily make these standalone nations. They don’t need a full lineup.
how is East and West Germany a big stretch?
both literally came forth from the 3rd reich and then reunited
they formed from the same nation and became a single nation
6 Likes
They were literally countries at the most odds with each other as possible. The predicted frontline of the cold war. The entire identity of each country molded by the western allies and the USSR respectively. They came from the same nation. They eventually became the same nation. But one tree shouldn’t have MiG-19s supporting Leopard 1s, because that is ahistoric. You don’t understand what this game used to be and how much was stripped away from it. It may seem normal to you. but I promise, this is not how it should’ve been.
3 Likes
There’s plenty of ahistoric things. From reloads to vehicles being mishmashes of multiple versions, to the maps.
Also how else could you make Germany if you split east and west Germany up? Sure they may be able to hang on via ground and maybe coastal (haven’t got there in bluewater) but air is an entirely different story. That and how would you link research from Ww2/interwar Germany and to Modern Germany?
2 Likes
Yes they already are a part, but they are sadly barely used and they have a lot of interesting vehicles :(
1 Like
Make it like the israeli tree where you unlock the DDR germany by reaching rank V with either Germany or USSR, normal Germany stays on the same tree.
That way we can get DDR vehicles with german crew without filling either the USSR or Germany trees with copy pastes, plus would allow the use of DDR decals which the USSR vehicles can’t.
That isn’t an excuse. “Other things are bad, so this bad thing doesn’t matter actually” All of that bothers me. Secondly, Just have them in different categories within the Germany line, no mishmashing allowed. No West Germany vehicles with East Germany vehicles. EZ
I can agree on the mish mash of variants but there’s a point where trying to follow realism and historical accuracy too much starts to upend enjoyment of the game and balance. Several of the subs were needed to bulk up lineups or fill in gaps. Same goes with the two Germany’s.
I mean I guess but looking at tier 5 TT, all but 2 jets are ww2 and the only east German ground vehicle at that tier is the BMP-1. Not to mention would this allow Swiss vehicles?
Also in RB, this wouldnt prevent East and West German vehicles working in tandem as long as one of each were on the same team (if I’m reading this correctly)
I feel that the need to “bulk up” lineups is a problematic solution to a problem that can be fixed by itself. Just don’t allow overstock ala "no more than two mbts or medium tanks per lineup, and one of everything else. As for the “gaps”, often they don’t need filling. Br is subjective and vehicles maybe a whole br lower than what you’re going for is more than adequate already.
Thats fine. They don’t really need more. But if you would want another, there’s the Hawker Seahawk Mk 101
T-54, T-55, ZSU-57-2, Shilka easy additions. And there is also BRDM-1 based 9P111 missile tank destroyer. All around the same br. East German Army also operated T-34-85, IS-2, SU-85, SU-100, 2S1, 2S3, and BMP-2.
Thats a different problem with its own solution, but even so, it would be much better in my mind than the lineup mishmash.