Community Update No.7: Talking About What’s Coming Soon!

I too am confused by their statement.

ok

So they spend all that money and time on this update but still not a decent anti cheat .

1 Like

It’s not the worst. What they should be spending money on is a complete mapping and gamemode revamp for RB and sim.

3 Likes

I have another question on the armaments. Gaijin going to make sure not to clap air to air rockets as ground attack right (EG the Swedish air to air rocket on the SK60/saab 105)? I would say anything with a tiny filler and next to no pen (like say the 2 inch RN rocket) should also not count as ground attack really either given they are more suited for air to air due to being woefully bad ground attack.

Rip no mirage IV nuke

1 Like

Why are you concerned about tanks getting stronger?

*Mirage 2000N

So when are they going to fix the HE rounds on planes cannons? Its only been 1+ years since the bug was accepted, i guess doing another copy paste premium F-18 it’s less effort and gives more money

2 Likes

mig-29 sniper to 13.0 and give r-73 or sth i forgot

Some countries’ main output is the air force, while their enemy is the ground

I think you’re very much in the minority in that opinion. :P

1 Like

Ok, since there is topic about spawn cost of aircraft in Naval, I will take a liberty of asking of lowering the initial price of Aircraft there.

For me and people I know, the initial spawn cost of aircraft in Naval is way too high especially, when I am not able to do the damage required to earn those by not being as proficient and knowledgeable in Naval, which causes to often not being able to spawn a single aircraft and if yes, then it is often near the end of the match so something else than Kamikaze attack is out of the question.

Personally, I think that making spawning in aircraft easier in Naval, would draw more Air players in Naval and increase the overall popularity of this notoriously unpopular mode.

From my experience it is very rare to see aircraft spawned in Naval at all and if yes, then there is minimal impact on match from these.

1 Like

Even if it’s less, it still objectively exists

“Objectively” ?

Why not just come up with a more difficult mode that is better than drastically changing the underlying mechanics of the game

The CAS change is welcome, it will make it so getting in the Su-30 and Su-34 or F-16C and F-15E for the double tap not possible anymore while making CAP more accessible as you can use your plane twice, once for CAS and for CAP if you die.

1 Like

You gonna finish the Spyder? Because you guys certainly didn’t finish modeling or coding it.

1 Like

Any other AA coming to France to bridge some of the gaps like between the woeful Roland and ItO 90M system other than the top BR stuff ? 9.7 to 12.0 is a huge difference in capabilities, its like jumping from a Leo 1a1 to a 2A7. looks like they are trying to build a 10.0/11.0 line up but its lacking AA atm.

it would be nice if these kinds of aircraft could be brought into two separate matchmakers with two different BRs depending on whether the AMRAAM modification is enabled or not.
In the case of the American block 20 ADF it does represent a very unique historical niche where the Airforce procured a version of the F-16A which could fire AIM-7 Sparrows for the US National Guard, who were seeking to acquire the F-20 Tigershark for it’s ability to use the former missile. Would be a shame to lose the ability to play the F-16A at those BR’s, even if they’re not the most “meta” fighters in the game currently.