Appearance is the definition of not copy-paste, cause people don’t understand research goes into vehicles to even determine if they can be copy-pasted let alone commission a new model.
Cause if people claim gameplay = copy-paste then I bring up how that argument makes M1A1 and Leclerc copy-pastes of each other and so far no one has liked when that valid critique was used against the bad vague definitions.
Either way a 2A4 premium means more unique vehicles in tech tree.
Yeah, another leopard is ‘meh’, may as well just play Germany or Sweden then.
It feels incredibly lazy. There’s nothing wrong with a premium lerclerc that would just be a copy of a TT one with another skin.
the BR is their issue but now we got another situation.
They claimed a nerfed round Leclerc would at 11.7 would be alone in a lineup.
Yet simultainiously announced hte addition of a prototype leclerc (which means)
It must either be 12.0 sitting with the other leclercs or sitting by itself at 11.0. 11.3 or 11.7
all of which means their excuse for not adding a nerfed premium one is extremely cheap and overall poor. AS they could of added it at 11.7 and the proto leclerc at 11.7 (unless they mean a leclerc prototype that is modern AF) which seems ridiculous to me
By whos standards?
By all intents and purposes if its modules are identical, its ammunitions, and ofc model short of the actual textures ontop of it, then its copy & paste.
If the percentile of it that is new, aka the skin outweighs the rest, modules, modifications and ofc the actually statistics then it isnt copy paste.
however it is infact copy paste.
Let me know when you’re available then mate, in about an hour or two?
will do the test
as I said above 10 shots at 90 degrees,
10 shots at 45 and
10 at LFP.
Ill take an M1A2 and you take an M1A2, you fire through at me and done n dusted.
I ll invite when i get home. Tho idk. In 2 hours i might go to bed xD
Dont worry man whenever you are free :D tis a game after all
French leopard premium is a clear copy paste.
Same vehicle but with a different skin.
Thats a practice training camera for recording. However, in order to operate JGSDF Type 81 and Type 11, either the KCU or FCS unit are necessary.
I’d lose my mind if they were to add sim-sized Falklands map
Yeah this is great an all but meanwhile we’re still stuck with then same broken matchmaking system and bad servers…
Ooooo
its the same missle as the current on just another seeker head
It is not naval events that many of us are asking for. It is recognition and communication from gaijin’s devs to the naval community on how badly NAB has been treated with the past updates, with the most recent one leading to the mass community protest by naval players. Up until even now, this has been ignored, despite multiple threads across the forum and polls. At what point will we actually get the level of communication on this front that ground and air players get?
Ah yes, the naval update that broke NAB. Wonderful, thanks for the help.
Massive news for the unemployed, afaik only the F-111s can do this irl, there are anecdotal that exist about other aircraft doing the same but they are not like F-111s as the other anecdotal are usually accidental or they are from malfunction and are unstable if they are done
Most aircraft have fuel dumping. F-111 isn’t the only one that can do it.
if ships got decompressed to 7.7 or 8.0 id start playing naval again
fuel dumping that create flame vs normal fuel dumping is different
things like the VARK VARK VARK can do it but other are either accidental leakage or unstable if they do so
Then why reply to the specific sentence that addresses fuel dumping? No one said the former.
should have disclosed it mb