I mean…just because it doesn’t happen to you doesn’t mean its not happening to others. That’s not false information at all. Your responses come across as if your experience is the only scenario players have, are, or will ever experience. That is false information. In terms of content creation as well, Zenturion is regarded to be fairly unbias in their videos. They tend to be short and consise versus say the likes the TEC or Matdawg.
The next major update will see several of these new systems come to the game for several nations at once.
I am concerned about this.
Why don’t you just copy-paste the ones you have for all nations until their respective vehicles are ready, the just remove them copy-paste one and transfer any RP over or just swap it for people who have it.
Why should some nations suffer?
Would sort of depend on the nation. Like Russia doesn’t need another top tier SPAA. The Pantsir has absolutely dominated that particular field of the game since 2023. They don’t need another. So yeah, some nations makes sense versus saying all.
A bit difficult to read but this sort of highlights why one particular nation really doesn’t need another top tier SPAA
It is to say that the round consistently will go through the roadwheel and one tap the entire tank with spall generated by the turret basket.
Your video is
- A on the dev server all of hte issues with abrams for example where changed.
- B he has no specific controlled test to back up claims.
- C again I have no idea who this is or if its credible at all.
By whom?
his video has literally no numerical sources to it, no testing of a consistent amount of shots at multiple angles, as well as again its on dev server
Not live.
I tend to not use youtubers as evidence… I tend to either test it myself or find data from an actual test.
That video is concrete proof of nothing in the adult world.
There’s no indication that they won’t come to all nations. Maybe several could mean all but Russia, since Russia doesn’t really need a new top tier SPAA right now.
Nor do your posts in here. Just because it doesn’t happen to you, which requires us to just take you at your word, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. Again, the turret basket implementation was a nerf by the devs own design and words. It wasn’t intended to be a buff. And it is something that should either be applied to more tanks or removed from the Abrams and Leopard families.
Pantsir at 12.0 with a very good radar and ability to single handedly clear air + defend against tanks
Sure, but who knows how long that will be?
Why some some nations suffer with oppressive CAS using fictional weapons when it’s not neccessary that they do so?
I would assume more than 2 at least consdidering “several” implies more than 2 and while im surprised Sweden seem to be getting another SAM/SHORAD system I kinda wish they placed more emphasis on the nations that ACTUALLY need new SAMs or there first SAM cough Japan, Israel & Italy.
Russia certainly dont need a new SAM and that much is blatantly obvious
Something I’ve openly agreed with being added to every tank that has one.
Regardless of what you believe in my posts, I am at least going to conduct my own tests with it to see how it actually comes into play oppose to taking a random youtubers word for it.
They never said it was a nerf at all they said it was to prevent round essentially passing through crew compartments doing nothing, because IRL if you slam a 120mm dart into the side of the tank it tends to mess it up.
its been tested already and brought up I believe on the post about the baskets that people were taking one video and making it out as if it was happening everytime the tank got hit
That would not stop Gaijob
Unsure but I am aware it needs a FCS Vehicle to fire + its ARH
It doesn’t need the FCS vehicle to fire the ARH missiles, it’s only needed for datalink lock on after launch and search functions. The ARH missiles otherwise can be used in the same way that the lightwave version already can.
For missile performance it’s the same missile, only with a PESA radar seeker. It’s more pointy, which means less drag so it’ll bleed speed lower and perform to its stated effective range of 14km.
The missile doesn’t have the optical seeker anymore, it’s replaced with the radar one.
Yes, it can still use the KCU to designate targets. It can also fire without a lock and have the missile self search for a target, same as the lightwave missile, but this would need to be a new feature added to the game.
Oooooo
Side note I saw on some Type 81’s theres a little camera like thing on the top
do uk what that is?
looks like a sight or something
I feel like I absolutely have to ask, how can It possibly be stated that they do not want to add the Leclerc prototype as a premium due to lack of armor knowledge while the premium Ariete is in the game, nothing at all is known about its armor so it was just decided to give it worse armor then most WWII tanks and just got added like that no questions asked? Why wasn’t It tech tree then? Because if we ever get information about the Arietes armor then the value is going to skyrocket. The way I can tell is because it weighs about 20 tons less than the SEP V2 and has only 230 less HP, and yet its still slower even while having 24 PTW ratio while the Abrams is 21. The only reasonable explanation is it having minimum more armor than a Tiger II.
I’m seeing ALOT of talk about china and Germany getting SPAA similar to the pantsir for balance and may be the IRIS-T. Just want to point out that Germany, Russia and China are usually always on the same team so if they are all on SPAA it’s going to be insanely difficult for CAS players.
I was really looking forward to a premium leclerc too. France is a nation I want to grind.