Community Update No.13: What’s Coming Up!

My point was that calling a vehicle, based on a pre-existing vehicle, unique because it has a different 3D model and a different radar (that means little in-game) is stretching the meaning of ‘unique’ a little.

Well this I 100% agree with. A lot of people will scream “copy paste” at vehicles that just aren’t copy-paste. I for one do support actual copy-paste when necessary, and also minimally-modified vehicles (again, when necessary). But that doesn’t mean there aren’t different levels of uniqueness, and the PRTL sits lower than actual domestically-designed BeNeLux vehicles.

3 Likes

Not at all. Sadly its just become commonplace these days to bundle everything that isn’t an entirely new vehicle outright as “copy paste” to write it off.

Many vehicles are based on or variants of preexisting vehicles. Including some of the suggested vehicles discussed in this conversation of French origin too. That doesnt mean they are all “copy paste” because they are combinations of existing hulls or turrets.

9 Likes

Agreed

3 Likes

Well then ill ask you at a later stage :)

Im just being happy for Submarines

1 Like

I would like if the dreams come true could be a tank I don’t like planes

1 Like

To each their own

It was disapointing wen they added the pancake because is just another USA CAS of course with 2 Big bombs but pancake is better wen they add cool tanks like the long Tog II or the KV-7 or the sturmtiger sadly I coudnt get the Tog and sturmtiger

1 Like

Knowing how mouch Gaijin hates Italy, it will only fire from one barrel at a time with a rate of fire of 5 RPM at 10.3

2 Likes

This is just horrible logic. It’s a technically distinct vehicle, it only shares a chassis.

By the same logic the Leopard 2A4 and Leopard 2RI/PL are copy paste vehicles, and so are most variants of anything really. What this should be called is a unique variant that you personally aren’t interested in.

All this does is overuse the term, making it less meaningful even when it actually applies.

2 Likes

Italy already have enougth soviet SPAAs I don’t think they will give them now a Gepard

I know what’s not coming up and it’s making the game worthwhile to play outside of “get/grind vehicles” …
You don’t even fix crap that need a patchfix… one of the daily ones.
Everything you add is more incomplete /playable after 2-3 years things…
Really fix your game.
You tossed a NE mode in the WORST iteration you could, and you don’t even fix join mission in progress, you don’t give a damn about feedback… you don’t even fix mandatory things like the damn SPAA or SAM spawn directly below you and shoot you (and that’s nothing to do with skills etc, you have no reaction time…just spawns and shoots you from too close distance) .
I don’t see anything around “we’ll fix the issues… Just " we’ll add add add” more problems and unfinished things…

1 Like

4 months after a paragraph of 1A5BE justification btw

3 Likes

What br will it be at?

Also why not add an actual french spaa that fills the 5.7 to 8.7 SPAA gap and not just a gepard variant that won’t really do that at all.

2 Likes

With subs that means HMS Royal Oak soon? Right?
:(

1 Like

Yeah, finally! All the work I’ve put into my Type VII article on the wiki is paying off—hopefully I can get it finished by the time it’s released.

1 Like

Btw do not play that “People want Dutch Gepards” card. Of course, we have Dutch players too.

Make a real poll this time, a one that we can see the votes, and ask whether we want the Dutch (and Belgium) as a seperate tree or in the French tree

1 Like

Hello @Smin1080p_WT i saw that japan is recieving a firefly, is it just the Mk.1 or is it the FR.1? Also is this all the aircraft japan Is recieving this update?

F-35B will just be a copy paste of the F-35A /s

4 Likes

And the F-35C is a copy paste of the F-35A /jk

4 Likes