And its just a 2024 post with just 28 answers, what people wants its proper new maps, not WoT rips offs (im looking at you Atila)
Forgot about that one. 2025 December was the most satisfying month for me with very satisfying news for this game.
(Ofc excluding infantry nobody wanted CoD in this game)
1 Like
read enough, j10c to 4.3
The old forum had lots of these request but sadly that site has been closed down but the link I posted was to highlight that people did want old map remade!
Do they need them?
'ang on a mo thats me!
2 Likes
Is the US so far behind that they need that buff and no one else?
they get the 120D because people overestimate missiles abilities and think the B can larp 360s
Thats fair enough, but regarding ground maps. He doesnt seem to want to elaborate further onto what other ground maps are wanted back into the game.
Yeah, the number of times I see B/C5s fired at 60-70km from a relatively slow platform is quite funny
Its also quite funny that people expect the A/B or C5 to pull like the MICA sub 5km when im already almost past them lmao. For sub 5km launches you get the 9Ms, for anything above you use the A/B but many arent ready for that conversation
I mean what do you think should come Ground maps wise that aren’t in the game anymore and should make a comeback ?
Yeah that too, I get a little bit of the complaint at shorter ranges though. Because Rafale and Su-30 have both IR and ARH missiles that can be used at short ranges really well. Aim-9M/Aim-120 users, dont. Not too mention the bug reports for both
But they definetly expect too much from them.
Should be faster than Rafale
Sort of the question. If US top tier aircraft are the ones struggling, why would you give the buff meant to make them more competitive to the airframes that are performing better? Not to be mean or rude. Just that the logic doesn’t track. The EFT and company seem more maneuverable and faster (in most aspects, correct me if I am wrong) than both the F-15 and F/A-18.
1 Like
but at the same time, why should the Typhoon or Gripen E be left behind?
This idea that “X vehicle is doing well therefore it can be forgotten” is really annoying. Especailly as its always the same few nations
If you are trying to dogfight an EFT in a F-15, then sure. But in BVR, they arent that far apart
People need to realize A/B just arent meant for practically IR ranges. But its too much to ask for considering big 3 players
1 Like
Super hornets have beaten EFTs in dogfights irl and it was very one sided
Because they’re still outperforming US aircraft at similar BRs? The argument isn’t that the Typhoon and Gripen are being left behind. I don’t think that is the correct lense to frame the issue. If US aircraft are lagging behind in terms of competitiveness, giving the 120D to every vehicle that carried it right off the bat puts you right back into the original situation of US vehicles not being capable of fighting.
The issue, in regards to your BVR vs. dogfighting, is that the Rafale and EFT and Typhoon can get into a better position eariler simply because they are faster airframes. Those three jets can get into a better BVR position faster than the F-15 and F/A-18 can. Why give them the better BVR missile? That, again respectfully, doesnt make sense.
So would it be better to not give anyone the 120D and just give the US planes the Aim-9X instead? So they’re more competitive in dogfighting? I dont think Gaijin is trying to forget the Typhoon or Gripen but rather make US top tier air more viable.
