Accepted report means it can either be done tomorrow or in 2037
Much more likely the latter
That would be nice. But I can’t even get the Bug Moderators to accept that the AH-1G/Tzefa A/Tzefa B gunsight being defaulted to the chin turret being wrong (even though I gave them the literal flight manuals that say the sight is boresighted to the pylon stores and the chin turret control is a secondary, backup feature). They literally just go “this is not a bug”
No upfatea planned for Air Sim?
Im not asking for a new seaker or the same seaker as MICA, just stating that if the only improvement it gets is just better range, it will get notched just as the others 120´s
1 Like
Because Gaijin seems to can’t fix alot of problems at once and are extremely slow. 4 years to remake a map lmao
5 Likes
Ngl, after Gaijin basically told us we were too stupid for more game modes, I doubt they would even touch SIM with a 10 foot stick.
2 Likes
Everyone that didnt grind its way to top tier via bombing bases and crashing right after*
2 Likes
3 Likes
The only seeker-related improvements it gets (at least, in a way quantifiable in War Thunder) are in ECCM and we don’t have electronic countermeasures modelled in War Thunder yet. Anything else, like for example seeker field of view, is classified information.
Oh, but don’t worry, content creators were crying about there being mud and it slowing down wheeled vehicles… forgetting the whole reason tanks went to tracks because they do better cross country
3 Likes
Maybe if they stop working on an infantry mode and fix the game everyone keeps asking for…hm I wonder why
I honestly LIKED the mud pits in WRF. Made you have to use your BRAIN to move around the map, or be willing to wade through the mud if you wanted to take those routes. I am exite for WRF’s return 🥳
1 Like
Honestly, where did the player infantry thing come from outside the April Fools event? Ai infantry, sure. That adds depth to loadouts you have to choose and strategy on when to push/when to not/what to load and honestly, those events were a BLAST. Idk why we can’t have more of that seeing how we have the build feature now. Just have preset infantry constructions (like AT gun, ATGM launcher, etc)
What happens when devs are out of touch with their community…
1 Like
Idk, for a game called War Thunder, you’d think there would be infantry by now. Seems in touch to me
1 Like
SOOOOO, I am still in the middle when it comes to Infantry. I participated in the 1st round of the Beta test, and I have to be honest it was not nearly as bad as I thought it could be. I still probably wont play it much, if at all. Buuuuuut it still felt like War Thunder for the most part and not COD et al like I was worried it would be.
Nah, players just wanna hold W (at least according to content creators/Gaijin). Look at how the fighter mafia nerfed bomber gunners into uselessness. I made the following post a WHILE back Bomber gunners need a buff and is backed by history - Machinery of War Discussion / Aircraft - War Thunder — official forum. Ai gunners are literally useless
2 Likes
Yes, i know, thats what my statement its all about, that this new AIM-120 wont be really relevant unless it gets a buff that it just wont get
Well, there USED to be back in the day, though they didn’t do anything. They just needed to expand on that imo