Question, does inertial drift still exist when the missile is being actively guided (IOG+DL) since it is being done on IOG also or just only when it is IOG only? @DevilO6
Do A2A missiles even have IOG drift?
Genuinely something ive never even thought about or noticed being an issue like it is for A2G
Only in the Gaijin Store.
man :C ok, ty for the answer
Hopefully GBU-53 would be added as US is the only one currently missing similar type of A2G weapon like SPICE 250. (Also they are in the files.)
2 Likes
This could be anything from German/Soviet/American ww2 SPHs that have been long awaited^^
Or even some low tier swedish ones! The list is long and wide^^
Looking forward to it o7
And more IFVs are always welcome o7
Yes they do
Still doesnt work
It still exists in both cases, just DL compensates for it.
Jokes aside, I’m pretty sure for ‘standard’ aircraft we’re running out of 4th gens (I feel like War Thunder is specifically trying to gobble up every jet in existence and have it in the game… which I’m not complaining about :P) and the top of the line aircraft left are just the F-16C PoBIT/Block 70/72 and F-15EX.
I will welcome their addition, obviously, but I hold no expectation of it.
Also, 12 AIM-120Ds are the least of my worries.
I would hope that the meteors are a good while away for the AESA EFTs and Rafales if they actually care about balance.
Restarting the game (once or twice) fixes this.
1 Like
1 Like
Should two-way datalink remove IOG drift completely in a similar effect to GNSS when it has DL even if DL compensates for it?
Nope. Without GNSS it would not do it. 2 way DL would allow for DL while the seeker is tracking, comparing the target, and changing targets.
Maybe, it could kind of compensate for the IOG drift, as the missile could provide the place it thinks it is, and the launch platform could compare it.
Shouldn’t you be adding the R-77M to compliment the AIM-120D?
F-18F/E block 3 are also left
Dang, no news on more WWI vehicles.
1 Like
mach 1.2 monsters
lmao