Community Predictions for Future Premium Aircraft

๐™‘๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™š ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ชโ€™๐™™ ๐™ข๐™ค๐™จ๐™ฉ ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™™๐™™๐™š๐™™ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™œ๐™–๐™ข๐™š


With more nations receiving top tier premium aircraft equipped with Fox-3 missiles, weโ€™ve been discussing which aircraft could be the next additions to WarThunder. Below is a collection of some of the most popular suggestions from the community.

Each nation has its own poll, so make sure to vote for your favourite and share why you think your choice would make a great addition. Every aircraft listed is capable of carrying Fox-3 missiles and would fit within the current 13.0 to 13.7 battle rating range.



๐™€๐™ช๐™ง๐™ค๐™›๐™ž๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง ๐˜ฝ๐™–๐™ก๐™–๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™จ

For the early Eurofighter suggestions, the proposed loadout would be limited to four AIM-120A and four AIM-9M missiles, without dual pylons for balancing reasons. Once battle rating decompression is introduced, the AIM-120A loadout could be increased to six AIM-120A missiles.

If you disagree with the proposed loadout for the early Eurofighters, Iโ€™d be more than happy to hear your thoughts. เดฆเตเดฆเดฟ(โ€”แด—โ€” )


๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ


๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐—™.๐Ÿฏ ๐—™๐—ฆ๐—ฃ


๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿญ (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ)

IMG_5416


๐—”๐˜๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ต (๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ)


๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ


๐™’๐™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™จ ๐˜ฝ๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃโ€™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ?
  • ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐—™.๐Ÿฏ ๐—™๐—ฆ๐—ฃ
  • ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿญ (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ)
  • ๐—”๐˜๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ต (๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ)
  • ๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ
0 voters

Small warning: the Tornado F.3 FSP cannot carry any ground-attack weapons, so it would be limited to the air role and wouldnโ€™t be particularly effective in ground battles.


๐™…๐™–๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ


๐—ฆ๐˜‚-๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ๐—ฆ๐—ž๐—  (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ)


๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—” ๐—•๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฒ๐— ๐—Ÿ๐—จ (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ)


๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ๐——๐—

IMG_5432


๐™’๐™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™จ ๐™…๐™–๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃโ€™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ?
  • ๐—ฆ๐˜‚-๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ๐—ฆ๐—ž๐—  (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ)
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—” ๐—•๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ ๐—ฒ๐— ๐—Ÿ๐—จ (๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ)
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฑ๐——๐—
0 voters

๐™‚๐™š๐™ง๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎ


๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ (๐—Ÿ๐˜‚๐—ณ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ/๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ)


๐—™-๐Ÿฐ๐—™ ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—œ๐—œ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ (๐—ช๐—ง๐—— ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ)

IMG_5433


๐™’๐™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™จ ๐™‚๐™š๐™ง๐™ข๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ฎโ€™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ?
  • ๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ (๐—Ÿ๐˜‚๐—ณ๐˜๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ/๐—”๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ)
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿฐ๐—™ ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—œ๐—œ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ (๐—ช๐—ง๐—— ๐Ÿฒ๐Ÿญ)
0 voters

๐™„๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ก๐™ฎ


๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ (๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป)


๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—”๐—  ๐— ๐—Ÿ๐—จ (๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ)

IMG_5437


๐™’๐™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™จ ๐™„๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ก๐™ฎโ€™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ?
  • ๐—˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐Ÿญ (๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป)
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—”๐—  ๐— ๐—Ÿ๐—จ (๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ)
0 voters

๐™„๐™จ๐™ง๐™–๐™š๐™ก


๐—™-๐Ÿฐ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—œ๐—œ ๐—”๐—จ๐—ฃ (๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ)


๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—– ๐—•๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ (๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ)


๐™’๐™๐™ž๐™˜๐™ ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ ๐™ฌ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ก๐™ž๐™ ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™จ๐™š๐™š ๐™–๐™จ ๐™„๐™จ๐™ง๐™–๐™š๐™กโ€™๐™จ ๐™ฃ๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™š๐™ง ๐™ฅ๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐™–๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ?
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿฐ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—œ๐—œ ๐—”๐—จ๐—ฃ (๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ)
  • ๐—™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐—– ๐—•๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ (๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ)
0 voters

๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก ๐™๐™๐™ค๐™ช๐™œ๐™๐™ฉ๐™จ

These are some of the communityโ€™s predictions, but there are certainly other aircraft that could fill these roles. Vote for your favourite aircraft in each poll, then share your own ideas and reasoning in the comments. It will be interesting to see which aircraft the community supports the most for each nation.


togif


๐™๐™š๐™˜๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐˜พ๐™–๐™ข๐™ค๐™ช๐™›๐™ก๐™–๐™œ๐™š ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š๐™ง๐™ฃ๐™จ

Iโ€™m fine with whatever option they choose, as long as it comes with a wide selection of interesting camouflage options. An $80 premium aircraft should include as many quality camouflages as possible, especially considering the price.

This should also include camos from different operators to add more variety and make the vehicle more appealing. Iโ€™ve never been a fan of adding expensive premium aircraft that only come with a single camouflage. For example, the Tornado F.3 FSP could receive the Saudi Arabian Air Force camouflage as an alternative skin.

IMG_5476

A few examples of ones Iโ€™ve really liked in the past:


๐˜ผ๐™™๐™™๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ๐™–๐™ก ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง๐™ข๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‡๐™–๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง


Spoiler

๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ก๐™ฅ ๐™Ž๐™๐™–๐™ฅ๐™š ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™‰๐™š๐™ญ๐™ฉ ๐™‹๐™ง๐™š๐™ข๐™ž๐™ช๐™ข ๐˜ผ๐™ž๐™ง๐™˜๐™ง๐™–๐™›๐™ฉ

Iโ€™ll wrap up the post by showing which aircraft received the most votes from the community.

For those of you voting for the Typhoons, itโ€™s not looking too good right now. That said, I could definitely see something like it being added and placed at 14.0 once proper decompression is implemented and the top BR reaches 15.0 or 15.3.

For the air enjoyers seeing this for the first time, Iโ€™d really appreciate it if you could take part in the polls and share your thoughts. Iโ€™m especially interested in hearing what you think the next premium aircraft for the smaller nations could be.



๐˜ผ๐™ซ๐™ค๐™ž๐™™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฉ๐™๐™š๐™ง ๐™-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฒ๐˜ผ๐™ˆ ๐™Ž๐™ž๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ

The main reason Iโ€™m making these polls is to avoid a repeat of the Belgian F-16AM situation. It received a lot of backlash and was eventually replaced with a Dutch F-16AM. If we establish what the community actually wants beforehand, hopefully Gaijin can avoid making the same mistake again. Thatโ€™s why I think itโ€™s important to vote and discuss these options now, before the next premiums are announced.



๐™’๐™๐™ฎ ๐™Ž๐™ฌ๐™š๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ ๐™Ž๐™๐™ค๐™ช๐™ก๐™™ ๐™‚๐™š๐™ฉ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ

I also think Sweden should be the only nation to receive a premium Gripen, which is why I didnโ€™t include one as an option for Italy. If another export Gripen were to be added, Iโ€™d rather see a Czech Gripen become Swedenโ€™s top-tier premium. A Brazilian Gripen would be too advanced for this role, since itโ€™s an E model, making it unsuitable as a premium at the current stage of the game.



Knowing Gaijin, I wouldnโ€™t be surprised if Sweden eventually gets something along these lines, especially considering how poorly the JA37DI F-21 has been performing.



๐™’๐™๐™ฎ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™Ž๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™จ๐™ ๐™/๐˜ผ-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿด ๐™’๐™–๐™จ๐™ฃโ€™๐™ฉ ๐™„๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™ก๐™ช๐™™๐™š๐™™

I didnโ€™t include the Spanish F/A-18 as an option for the Italians because there are already three F/A-18 premiums in the game, and I think three of the same premium vehicle should be the limit.



That said, the Spanish F/A-18 would still offer something different. Unlike the existing premiums, it can carry Fox 3 missiles, while having a more restricted loadout than the tech-tree F/A-18 for balancing reasons so it can work at 13.7. That would give it a unique place among the existing Hornets.


IMG_5565


In hindsight, I probably should have included it in the poll for those who really like the aircraft, thatโ€™s my bad. I wouldnโ€™t mind seeing it added, but having four F/A-18 premiums available on the store at the same time would probably be pretty controversial. Gaijin could potentially remove one of the packs making it a GE premium instead, keeping the number of store premiums at three. It would also make the Spanish F/A-18 a more appealing addition commercially rather than simply adding another Hornet to an already crowded selection.



The same reasoning applies to the Kuwaiti F/A-18, which is why I didnโ€™t include it as an option for Britain either. Itโ€™s not completely out of the question for Spain, considering Britain received the CF-188A Hornet Pack not too long ago.



๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉโ€™๐™จ ๐˜พ๐™ก๐™š๐™–๐™ง ๐™๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™๐™ฅ!

Aircraft that perform similarly to one another have never stopped Gaijin from adding them as event, squadron, or premium vehicles, so I understand your points, but that ultimately comes down to personal preference.



There also isnโ€™t a Czech sub-tree in the game, so the Czech Gripen could reasonably be handled in the same way as other vehicles operated by nations without their own sub-tree. We already have examples of this with Canada, where Canadian Leopards are placed in the German tree, while other Canadian vehicles can be found in a few other nationsโ€™ trees as well.



The same logic can apply to the Czech Gripen. It was operated by the Czech Republic, but the Gripen itself is a Swedish design, so placing it in the Swedish tree would make sense.

This isnโ€™t a hate post, either. I simply didnโ€™t discuss Sweden because Sweden wasnโ€™t part of the original post. Little hint: if it were, there would be a vote for it. ๐Ÿคฏ
Thereโ€™s really no reason to turn this into something it isnโ€™t.


๐™„๐™› ๐™„๐™ฉโ€™๐™จ ๐™‚๐™ค๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™ƒ๐™–๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ฃ, ๐™‡๐™š๐™ฉโ€™๐™จ ๐™Ž๐™๐™–๐™ฅ๐™š ๐™„๐™ฉ

Furthermore, if youโ€™d like me to save any Swedish options in the replies for a future post covering Swedish and American premiums, Iโ€™d be more than happy to do that, I was planning on it if you can believe it. The more we discuss these things beforehand, the better the chance of avoiding the same mistakes in the future.

I included America because I have a feeling theyโ€™ll receive another premium around 13.7 or 14.0 eventually, especially since American premiums tend to sell very well.



We may not always like these premiums, but you and I both know nobody gets in the way of Gaijin and profit. We might as well predict and help shape the inevitable outcome.



5 Likes

Another year or two and Japans top tier premium will be the A6M5.

20 Likes

Iโ€™d say more like a couple of months.

2 Likes

@Morvran_ Iโ€™m actually starting to like the idea of all these Eurofighters. Would it really be a broken premium if it was limited to only four AIM-120As?

YF-23 at a beautiful $90

5 Likes

Predicting the inevitable, itโ€™s only a matter of time.

cachedMedia

3 Likes

maybe being paid it would force devs to fix the captor lmao

New method: asking for premium versions of your favourite aircraft will fix it.

4 Likes

Howโ€™d that go with Spikes and the Puma?

1 Like

Anyway issue with EFT isnt missile loadout - even with only 4x AMRAAMs it still EFT FM wise (or at least as far as i know). Put it at BR too low and it could potentionally be problematic.

1 Like

13.7 with that missile loadout would be alright. I could be wrong, and it seems pretty reasonable.

Also nice would be the Mirage 2000-5 BGM (just a double seater)
M-2000-5_small

This could work really well, even the single seat version. However, considering Gaijin has avoided adding Mirage 2000 premiums for France, they would probably do the same for Israel, which is really frustrating.

1 Like

The single seat version is for the regular TT, so the double seat can be an event/squadron,/premium, but yea I guess they wonโ€™t put a 14.0 as a premium (yet)

could be goated event

underwater-recovery-in-june-2011-of-a-hellenic-air-force-v0-z6f5zu9t78ac1

2 Likes

I wouldnโ€™t put too much hope into that. They literally avoided adding the F1EM because of the MICA missiles.

1 Like

Make it 13.3 ))

There is 2 different approachs I see to the T1 EFTs.

Aim-120Bs instead of C5s (You can debate whether that is actually a downgrade or not), but whether the loadout should be restricted or not is a debate (i.e, no dual rack AMRAAM). I dont see any reason why the loadout should be restricted in terms of Aim-9M fit (dual rack Aim-9Ms) nor why you should be able to run 6x Aim-120B.

I dont know if that would be enough for it to be 14.0 instead of 14.3 though.

A2G should be the area of most restriction, probably limited largely to unguided weapons and maybe GBUs. This would probably allow it to be a little lower in GRB like 12.7.

Straight C&P of the M-Scan Typhoons A2A loadout, but with the restricted A2G loadout from above. So it would definetly be 14.3.

You could do a 4+4 restriction on it, but it would still be 14.0.

Given that they wont add โ€œtop tierโ€ premiums which at the moment would be 14.7 and not 14.3, that isnt necessarily an issue, and by the sounds of it, airโ€™s max BR will be increasing again sometime soonโ„ข

In either case, I dont see why they would be broken premiums if placed at a reasonable BR, they would only be โ€œbrokenโ€ if they did what they do with the soviets and place them a full BR+ below where they should be (though 13.3 Typhoons would eb kinda fun).

The CAPTOR-M though is a terrible radar to the point the M-Scan Typhoons really arent any good at 14.3 at the moment

2 Likes

I mean, how many jets do we have at 14.7 which have still a Mech radar?
Dont they all have AESA at 14.7?

Yup, but even compared to the M-Scans of other nationsโ€ฆ Its not in a good state

They can do whatever they want, as long as it can realistically work at 13.7.

Iโ€™d probably prefer them over the F-16s because of the BOL pods. Iโ€™ve played the F-16s a little and found the limited number of countermeasures to be really frustrating. Having to sacrifice a missile just to carry more countermeasures, because you canโ€™t carry air to air missiles on the MAW pylon, is incredibly annoying as well.

Do vote, because although it probably wonโ€™t directly affect anything, it would still be interesting to see what happens if the poll gets enough attention.