If you want, you can add this video in there too. As far as I’m aware Northrop Grumman is the only company currently making 30x173mm High Explosive Proximity ammunition.
(Btw let us know when the bug report is up so we can all take a look at it and click the having the same issue thing)
I have sent you a report including your information. It’s my first time so I’m sorry if there are any mistakes :)
All good! Let’s hope it goes through!
No. IRL examples do not have the same frontal composite LFP armor
BugReport List
Not applied
CTWV RCV spall liners improperly modeled Reported by Gelatinous_Sire
acknowledged
Telescope mast not fully extended
wrong Telescopic mast HFOV
have VT & Air burst bullets Reported by 鴎花
fixed
coax is mk52 bushmaster chain gun
engine exhaust port in wrong position.
Incorrect Name Reported by Cpt_Naoshi_Kanno
missing driver Thermal Imager
Wrong Power pack position
Submitted as a suggestion
not a Bug
Using Wrong APFSDS Round Reported by コタリ
If you have anything to add, please tell me.
Doing the good work
The above source says that it is equivalent to type 16, but are there any other sources? I couldn’t find anything, so I would appreciate it if you could let me know.
Not amazing illustration but you can see that the MCV has an add on composite on the front in comparison to the RCV
America??? Stryker dragoon? when? LAV3? when?
Thank you for your reply. It’s a shame that it’s not available in the RCV version. I’d like to see an armored version someday.
Not approved. There was a place to attach a file, so I attached a pdf from the Ministry of Defense, but should I have put it as a URL?
Ehhhh… It’s fine. Apparently they have an internal report ongoing about the presence of the proximity ammo, I’m just guessing one financial document wasn’t enough for them as a primary source.
Wrong APFSDS Round have been marked as not a Bug.
Also i made an Report about the Name
Incorrect Name for the RCV (P) // Gaijin.net // Issues
In a “Budget Request” they called it “Common Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Reconnaissance Combat Type”, so CTWV RCV (P) would be appropriate.
Name got changed on Dev Server version 2.38.0.20 to “CTWV RCV”.
Report still labeld as acknowledge but technicly its fixed now
Why do they add a vehicle with a singular interesting feature and than don’t bother to properly implement the feature, you can’t even look over a basic structure with it, using third person is more effective than this.
Perhaps a dumb question, but what’s the keybind to raise the antenna/commanders sight?
Same keybind as the one for raising/lowering search radars funnily enough, “Switch Radar/IRST search on/off”.
Default is alt-R from memory.
Huh, never thought that could be it. Thank you!
No problem
