CM Covert Disclosures No.4: Information & Q&A with War Thunder Game Director, Viacheslav Bulannikov!

[Bringer_Of_War]

Another one of those forum duelists with forum duelist takes… right

[AlvisWisla]

And here you are claiming air RB is dueling.
Air RB isn’t just WVR.

[magazine2]

Hi, as mentioned in the Q&A:

As for the current Roadmap, we plan to complete most of the remaining parts before the second major update in 2025.

[SoloWing_Makarov]

@AlvisWisla

And yes, the F-15E’s dogfight performance is sub-par, below that of even Mig-29SMT because the F-15E weighs over 15,000kg EMPTY while needing more fuel than other aircraft.

Ah, thanks for reminding me - 29SMT still haven’t received its upgraded engines, and X-ray in hangar is outright lying.

[Tactical_ra1nbow]

@magazine2

so we’ll move towards heavier systems for all nations, including those components of which are located on several chassis. Of course, we’ll have to solve the problem of controlling these types of SAM systems, but we’re already having thoughts on the matter.

In turn, there are plans to add new capabilities for aircraft. And while we do not consider anti-radiation missiles (ARM) a priority and necessity, more advanced capabilities of ESM from on board an aircraft, i.e. more accurate determination of the active radar position, are in our fairly close plans.

No, JUST NO!
Stop this power creep racing!

SAM should be controlled by AI not lowIQ or AFK players.

[Bringer_Of_War]

You are the one making statements relative to Air RB

Nobody spoke about dueling in the entire thread

[cortbowan]

Naval AI Gunners then, not the Bomber AI Gunners :D

[AlvisWisla]

29SMT has its correct engines at this time.
And no, the x-ray isn’t lying.
RD-33 Series 3 engines are a reliability and fuel efficiency upgrade.
You’re thinking RD-33M/MK which this 29SMT doesn’t use IRL.

[SoloWing_Makarov]

@AlvisWisla

And no, the x-ray isn’t lying.

It is giving incorrect thrust number. It’s a lie, and you’re delusional.

[Giovanex05]

@AlvisWisla

@Giovanex05
Outside simulator, I’ve had no issues with R-77s and R-27s. In simulator I have had issues with R-77s, but not to the point where they’re objectively dissimilar.
People thinking similar = identical need to grab a dictionary.

And yes, the F-15E’s dogfight performance is sub-par, below that of even Mig-29SMT because the F-15E weighs over 15,000kg EMPTY while needing more fuel than other aircraft.

R-77s are not the main problem: the radar is garbage, can’t keep track of anything in TWS. Flight performance is terrible. F-15E doesn’t dogfight well (also never argued about dogfight performance, i was talking about BVR) but has insane acceleration energy retention and climb rate which are the most important parameters in air RB and BVR in general.
Su-27 has average acceleration and terrible dogfight performance, only F-15E is worse (and not by a lot).

About equal in BVR to the F-15E is simply an objectively wrong take, Su-27sm has NOTHING BVR related that is better than the F-15E

[WalletWorrier]

I fear new “subtrees” will only amount to diluting nations with meta foreign vehicles instead of genuinely representing a new nation in-game

[_QAQ]

@magazine2

“Missile Evaded” message: We analyzed player feedback and decided to improve this feature. In some modes it will be completely hidden (SB), and in the rest (AB, RB) it will be possible to hide it or leave it at the player’s discretion. Evasion statistics in the debriefing menu will remain for all modes. We’re working on the ability to hide or enable the message at the moment, if everything goes fine this option will be available soon.

what about add bonus for Evaded a missile?take off and killed by a ARH missile like AIM54 is quite boring and lack of interaction.the bonus can be small and have a limit(like 5~10 points per missile and 100~200 points as the limit)I’m sure that’s what players want to see

[통모짜핫도그vs요즘잘자쿨냥이]

@AlvisWisla

and similar in BVR.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[xPorkulusx]

Wow… so many new vehicle types confirmed and hinted at in this… I’m so excited!!!

Confirmed:
Top battleships (we knew this was coming at some point)
Submarines
Heavy AA systems

Possible:
Jet bombers
Jet interceptors
Carriers
EW aircraft

[来如雷霆收震怒_罢如江海凝清光]

Considering that the developers say that “Soviet aircraft are in a weak position” and that the Soviet Union does not yet have a competitive aircraft in the current leaks, does this mean that Russia is about to acquire another powerful fighter in this version? Su-27SM3？ Su-30SM？ Or is it something else I don’t know about?

[Necronomica]

There is something many miss and can cause misunderstandings so wanted to ask:

Have you taken into account channel-loss of the engines or are you using the static test numbers and comparing them straight with the numbers shown in game?

Or have you tested the thrust in game and found it to differ from what its stated to be?

Also, please be nice.

[BOMBAY9997042]

@magazine2

Q: Submarines were tested some years ago. Are there any plans to add playable Submarines to naval battles, or in some form to the game?
A: Yes, we have plans for playable submarines, but no further details on this yet.

GATO class when?

@magazine2

Q: With the addition of the F-117, being a very cool but “novelty” aircraft, will we see more additions like these, such as interesting vehicles that wouldn’t fit too well into the meta?
A: Obviously, these types of aircraft that are “not very well fitting into the meta” cannot be a regular addition to the game, since we try to please as many players as possible with updates. But these types of vehicles will appear from time to time. Including some interesting things that are already in the plans for 2025.

would a JEEP Willys MB be considered a novelty vehicle?

[AlvisWisla]

@SoloWing_Makarov
Gaslighting others isn’t cool, and the thrust number is correct.
29 9.12 [the one I have spaded]:

Spoiler

SMT:

Spoiler

Thrust is correct.
Unless you’re talking about uninstalled thrust, but the Mig-29 has an anti-FOD device that blocks airflow until a high enough speed.
After the anti-FOD device opens, the thrust correctly increases until over a peak thrust of 13,000kgf per engine.

If you don’t like Mig-29’s anti-FOD device lowering thrust on the runway [and only the runway], then that’s an issue you have with Mikoyan, not Gaijin.

[SPANISH_AVENGER]

So many amazing news I look forward to!

The player card feedback is nice; but what I am looking forward the most to is… “the most powerful and famous Battleships?”, AT LAST! And most importantly; more and more powerful SAM systems for Top Tier, YAY!

Very nice post overall, thank you a lot for these news!

[BOMBAY9997042]

@SPANISH_AVENGER

Battleships

temper temper?