CM Covert Disclosures No.4: Information & Q&A with War Thunder Game Director, Viacheslav Bulannikov!

yep, they kept the russian jets with under BR’d missiles as a band aid fix ever since they fk’d the fm up and since then have not yet been bothered to actually look into the fm further to deal with the root causes of the poor performance. If they simply just delt with that then the jets would more or less be fine (in addition to fixing the radar scan pattern - which has an outstanding bug report just sitting there since like june)

1 Like

Steam already done all work for you for free, why not just link player customization with Steam?

Aaaaah that’s why… shoulda guessed.

Watched this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td_PGkfIdIQ old-ish interview with our Lord Gaben. You guys still have a lot to learn.

fastest “helicopter” in game

1 Like

I legit have spaded entire tech trees to see the number go up. If we dont get spaded back I will be LIVID.

4 Likes

Soviet jets don’t have under-BR’d missiles.
Mig-29 9.13 is 12.7 not 12.3.
And the Mig-29SMT is just part of many under-BR’d AMRAAM carriers [the literal definition of AMRAAM, not any specific missile, I might say AMRAHM… hmmm…].

This is false.

As the charts in the MiG-29 handbook say the thrust should be 7800kgf per engine (so 500kgf channelloss per engine)

the ADV-29 system (air intake flaps) does affect thrust irl, but not in warthunder.
If you make a custom test map and make the MiG-29 flow statically in the air the thrust stays the same at roughly 6850kgf per engine even tho the intakes are now opened.

This reduces its thrust to weight ratio from 1.14 at 60% fuel (13000kg weight total) [attachement 2] to a thrust to weight ratio of 1.05 at 60% fuel

The Bug forum mods refuse to accept this incorrection as gathering data with WTRTI is forbidden - they dont want it buffed.

13 Likes

Am a US main as well. Ive just seen that particular gripe quite often and that I agree on the idea of improving the flight model versus getting better missiles.

Leaning more towards aircraft carriers than submarines actually

1 Like

yea the top tier Russian missiles are already craked at close range

1 Like

I mean they confirmed submarines in the article itself.

I hope carriers come too though!

2 Likes

Eurofighter Typhoon reference?

7 Likes

No python 4? And pls give israel top tier spaa

1 Like

WVR sure, but saying it’s similar to the f 15E at bvr is just ragebait.

6 Likes

Or Rafale (it means gust of wind)

“watch out for extreme weather”

we both know that adding the ER when they did was a TERRIBLE decision and it was a tremendously under br’d missile that fk’d up the entire balance of top tier until 13.0+ jets came along. I mean thats been discussed at length already in other posts so no need to go into much again here. But that is specifically what im referring to here, i would not consider the r77 under BR’d myself - nor do i strictly think the r73 is either for the most part given the comparative platforms they are on.

Dear Gaijin Team

Thank you making game better

I hope you guys can adding photo mode in the future!!!

Since got ray tracing so I think adding photo mode is not an illegal thing, right ?

2 Likes

who’s the (redacted) that thought USSR needed a buff at top tier?!

i was arcade, end of the reflection.

please focus on making the map playable before pretty.

if you could be bothered not to make a billions Copy Paste while doing it, thank you.

yeah, wonder who’s fault is that…

patriot teased yeah!

start by fixing apcr, and then we’ll see (both angle penetration and post pen damage).

YES! Finally a good news. Now i hope the fourth will be a low tier (hear WW2) ground or air vehicle (something like the mb155?)

so the delay of the current update didn’t affect the schedule, nice.

2 Likes

3 games - all ended within ~5 minutes.
Should i continue this till i have 100 screenshots?
You’ll not accept the truth anyway. Isnt it?

Spoiler

BTW this 5 min games include ~3 min straight flight without any actions (waste of time)

7 Likes

Thrust at mach 0.4:

Spoiler

Thrust increases with anti-FOD device open:

Spoiler

@The_High_Ground
What part of similar is not identical do you not understand?
So either prove that Su-27SM and F-15E are identical, or agree with me and accept that they’re not identical.
“Saying they’re not identical is rage bait.” is such a trash take.