make it 8 if they added subs into the game
CM Covert Disclosures No.4: Information & Q&A with War Thunder Game Director, Viacheslav Bulannikov!
1 Like
And also, my personal opinions as much as it sounds very lame and boring maybe frustrated that we gets the same copy n paste vehicles again if not multiple times but if you think about it (just my thought) that I really enjoy the leo 2a6 and we have 2 techtree that has it (now 3 cause of Benelux) and sometimes I gets that feeling of wanting to play 2 of my favorite vehicles at the same time which is the Leclercs and 2A6 which does sounds amazing because I can just play either of those in the same match (which could be very “Cinema”) but generally speaking adding copy n paste vehicles does sounds like a lot of work tbh but it’s just how I feel like
They could replace the current coelian with one equipped with a wooden turret ? And add it for everyone lmao.
I see no need to really replace anything, there are a few wooden planes in the game, held together by glue after all.
I was against the yak 141 being equipped with IRST that was never fitted nor tested on the airframe I won’t be advocating for a steel turret never built
So… One more year of strike aircraft and bombers being pariah on their own mode(ARB)? Marvelous…
1 Like
its easy to stock grind top tier helis in PvE, stock ATGMs are a godsend, its the starter helis which are the issue, either rocket non CCIP against Gepards or missiles that do not outrange Gepards, the stock grind between my Apache AH.1 and Scout AH.1 are not even comparable, still haven’t even halfway spaded the Scout
Wooden mock-up = functioning prototype? lol
3 Likes
The only time I joined a Heli PVE match, all I did was fly from one point to another across the map before other teammates closer to the targets destroyed all of them, and repeat… I spent nearly a hour before figuring it wasn’t worth it. Never again xD.
Specially since, from what I’ve seen, rewards aren’t amazing either. Not even a full mod on a hour long match, etc (when they manage to see some action, which I didn’t).
1 Like
I grew tired of this debate years ago and generally side with Gaijin on it, but this is a good point. They shouldn’t be in SB at all.
5 Likes
Exactly they make no sense, why are they still in sim battles. Either bring them back or actually remove them from the game.
2 Likes
I’d be fine if they were removed from sim but allowed to be played in GAB/GRB as a compromise.
1 Like
They should in general remove weird stuff from sim.
I hate flying america in air sim, seeing a bf109 and learn it’s a friendly.
Or a zero, or a ki. Why do people even fly america if they go and use german or japanese planes is beyond me.
Especially in a mode with visual IFF and teamkill enabled.
4 Likes
This is very Hungarian sounding name, not going to lie
Then they’d have to remove all copy-paste vehicles from the game. If you see a F-84F, for example, it’s impossible to know at a first glance whether it’s American, German, Italian, French or Israeli. Same goes for planes like Phantoms and not all jets have IFF at those tiers. With Gaijin dead set on homogenizing tech trees with more sub-nations chock full of copy-paste (see Thai aircraft in Japan) it’s going to get worse in the future.
Or just ban all of them for Sim?
I really want it to be a reference to Eurofighter, I play Germany on a plane in Toptier, and it’s very difficult to play Toptier with a 1970 jet
I play Germany and I can’t stand playing toptier anymore with a 1970 13.0 jet that doesn’t have an ARH missile
1 Like
I think Richthofen means that the hull itself was functional. And that’s accurate as it was that of a Panther Ausf D that was pulled off the production line and selected to house the turret mockup. Legitimately speaking, the only actual part of the Coelion project that remained on paper is the turret
1 Like
Right, so the important part.