many reasons, international audience for example, china also uses english for aviation, HUD´s eg
btw now that i look at that AI image, it looks weird the text is orientated towards you as the viewer (so your PC screen), instead of being tilted with the actual background, and its like completely flat while the other image i posted is not
that isnt a small advantage.
yep, that’s a significant factor.
Because it’s AI
But that would mean J-10C would have to acquire a lock (or LOAL) with PL-15, which is different from the original story of J-10C being radio silent and AWACS did all the guidance things.
The with the j10c knowing the position of the target its own radar can find it more easily. As a baseline
LD-10 is now accurate stats wise but still does no damage and the PL-12/LD-10/SD-10(A) is now more draggy while on the pylon (and got their max speed that they could reach increased, means nothing) with the latest Dev update (CM102 is still C&P)
it does do damage (actually much more than pl12 with bigger warhead), it just still has proximity fuze so it self destructs barely damaging radar of ITO
so it does no damage
And the PBXH-4’s TNT-equivalent ratio suddenly sitting at ~0.83.Lmao
Didn’t they nerf all missile in terms of explosive mass?
all useing pbxn-4 missiles eavily affected by the ratio change 1.28→0.83(aim7，pl12，ld10).
PL-15 will deffo get changed
Poor PL-15, its total impulse and delta-v are so damn low. lol
btw kinda wrong thread for this but at low alt the CM-102 is slow as balls and loses speed with sustainer active, it deffo does not do a min mach 3.5 cruise for any substantial amount of time in its 100km range
edit:
CM-102 according to export sheet:
No less than = Maximum speed?why is that？
picking a random number above that will cause consistency problems between other equipment like why did X get more than Y
If Gaijin accepts all missile flight speed data in this way, then I have no objection.
