The nose tapers like on a naval sidewinder = PL-5
I think you are right. It’s apparently a PL-5B
The PL-12A are modelled the exact same as the PL-12 on the devserver rn apart from a 40 sec guidance time increase they are literally the exact same missile
According to the radar, the missile flies further. But I haven’t tested it in real-world conditions with players.
PL12
PL12A
I was hoping they would unnerf it since i think its still the weakest track rate of top tier…every other ARH is 60,PL12s is 20 same as the Phoenix…gaijin likes to bend and f China at every turn…
3 Likes
Look at new WS-10B lol, it’s using same exact thrust curve as WS-10A which is not how engines work irl
It actually makes J-10C worse now in turnrate and accel at most altitudes.
4 Likes
Theyve been garbage when related to modeling Chinese top tier lately…
PL-12A currently has 180° launch capability and different time to target tables, IOG has been set to 0 as well.
Anyway;
3 Likes
For future PL-15, new rocket code is officially in and officially supports two burns
"mass": 122.0,
"fireDelay": 0.0,
"propulsion0": {
"impulse0": {
"time": 4.0,
"force": 18800.0,
"massLost": 32.0
}
},
"propulsion1": {
"impulse0": {
"time": 2.0,
"force": 17625.0,
"massLost": 15.0
}
},
"propulsionAutopilot": {
"propulsionActivation0": {},
"propulsionActivation1": {
"startTimeMin": 4.0,
"timeToHitMin": 5.0,
"velocityMin": 350.0
}
}
8 Likes
Thats kind of what i expected but then again why delay the devserver 3 days and not even fix relatively simple things like this
2 Likes
3 Likes
suspiciously short burn times, man they are going to even make the pl-15 suck lol
1 Like
this is i derby ER
1 Like
PL-12A´s are still not updated apart from receiving GNSS
1 Like
Their inertial guidance drift have been set to 0