If Gaijin accepts all missile flight speed data in this way, then I have no objection.
thats how they do it for every thing
they take the highest concret number
type88 and phxn-4 is over
"dhl_1": {
"strengthEquivalent": 1.3,
"brisanceEquivalent": 1.4
},
"pbxn_4": {
"strengthEquivalent": 0.83,
"brisanceEquivalent": 0.85
},
"tp_88": {
"strengthEquivalent": 1.3,
"brisanceEquivalent": 1.3
},
for comparison
2 Likes
This ratio is incorrect; it should be 1.54.
6443/4184=1.5399≈1.54
1 Like
Would anyone be willing to join into a custom match with me to compile a comprehensive list of performance results by testing the PL-12 at different altitudes and launch velocities?
I’ve tried one report but it got shot down using a very stupid excuse which doesnt make sense if you think about it
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m0XIbH5emOjQ
Not only do they not give any values for their so called “optimal conditions” but the BRM also hits me with the stupid copypasta “appropriate source materials” when ive given NOTHING but the primary sources I.E. 2 versions of the SD-10A brochures that agree with each other.
If anyone is willing to help me execute the trials, lemme know.
7 Likes
Is it me or do PL-12 pull more since the update?
Lmao PL-12 worse then the sparrow now
keep in mind the PL-12 is finished burning at 7.5 second the Sparrow still has like 6 seconds of burn left
6 Likes
Did the Sparrow get changed?
yes
1 Like
What exactly was changed? Is there a changelog somewhere?
they did this
1 Like
Thank you very much.
they got the thrust thing changed too?
they got a complete rework and are amazing now
1 Like
is there a place where there is a side by side comparison for new and old?
2 Likes
your missing one of it passing 27er at long range from high alt
thats incredible.
did R27 get its rework?