China WS-10 Engine Full-Height Envelope and Performance

You misunderstood. They shared one set of core engines, which includes a high-pressure compressor, combustion chamber, and free turbine. They shared the CFM-56 core engine.

so now you are just spamming?

As you can see, I am conversing with multiple people, and I cannot answer the questions of two people in a single response.

first of all yes you

second of all writing the same reply 2 times to the same person is just spamming

Their foundation is the same; they share the core engine of the CFM56. Can you understand that?

not its not

since you dont have any proof

show proof

Engineering:Shenyang WS-10 - HandWiki
WS-10AζΆ‘ζ‰‡ε‘εŠ¨ζœΊ_η™ΎεΊ¦η™Ύη§‘
Shenyang WS-10 – All Aero

not a source just like wikipedia

a news article, not a source either

a blog post, not a source either

so my point still stands you dont have any proper sources for your claims

1 Like

So what do you want? Should I show you the internal engineering documents, or would you like to look at the textbook?

so you dont even know what a proper source is

i could go to that wiki page and just edit it
i can also just write a news article
and i could also just write a blog post

but that dosent mean that any of what i wrote is true

all of these say β€œbased on” aswell btw

1 Like

so they dont even say that it is the same engine core


i just have this form apparently the chief designer

Which is not traceable if its realy from him.
Potentialy classified or ai generated cause you cant name a source?

I can ask, but should be from his memoir
Not like it supports his point anyway lol

What you are saying is simply nonsense. This is like claiming that you could take an F110 engine and directly use a CF M56 core engine as proof. Can you show me or provide any reliable sources for what you are saying?

There are also people around me who have participated in the design of the WS-10 turbofan.

and what is that supposed to prove?

i can just say that i know the people who designed the J-20

2 Likes

IDK what even the point of argueing is, as far as all public sources go the WS-10 is based on reverse engineering parts of the CFM-56, and the WS-6 programm. No where afaik it is stated that it uses parts directly from said engines, so infering actual engine performance is not even really possible.

These are mostly nothing burger arguments