maybe they just think it’s not important/haven’t taken this issue seriously.
these ERA do not even cover 1/2 of the VT4 hull armor.
It seems to be from 11.12 to 11.17. I searched on the browser.
perhaps we can try submitting this suggestion to them at the Zhuhai Airshow?
Well you are right but if we look at the Ukraine war, there was only a handful of tank vs tank engagement and it seemed like they didn’t care for weak spots. They just shot wherever they could aim.
IRL its harder to aim at weakspots, so those small ERA gaps dont matter.
yea, but I still hope it can become better.
it’s just crazy
you should understand the game is game, irl is irl. what suit the game may not suit irl, the converse as well
this is just a row of ERAs. I haven’t added much. It doesn’t even affect the weight. this is not crazy.
I just think should make full use of those composite armor. this is a small, simple change.
If according to your idea, this photo is even crazier.
Would that even be possible, that they would listen to the suggestion?
I don’t know, but there shouldn’t be any difficulty in implementing these.
VT-4
Looks much smaller than in game. In game Chinese tanks are quite large despite originating from the T-72. Wonder if the models are actually off dimensionally and are actually indeed larger than they should be.
I wonder if we could ever get the external side fuel tanks modeled for other tanks and not just the VT-4.
Can any other chinese tanks use this APS?
Could be wrong, but looks like ZLT11 (at least it the same turret by the looks).
Besides, it isnt APS, it “just” a jammer sweep
did you know if the ZLT 11 can shoot the BTA2 (DTC02-105), they both have a 105 rifle barrel with the ZTQ-15
It’s definitely a ZTL 11
I’m trying to gather information, according to these sites the T-80UD can or has already taken from the BTA4, I don’t know if the values indicated seem better than the 3BM42 ??
and the VT4 is also supposed to have them !
By the way, Pakistan’s newest domestic APFSDS supposedly named Sejjel is an improved 125-II/BTA-4.
It penetrates 620mm of RHA equivalent at 2KM compared to 600mm of original BTA-4.
DTC10-125 is 680mm of RHA equivalent at 2KM, in comparison.
It indeed is a ZTL11 and you are absolutely right, that’s more of a jammer rather than an actual APS
Does anyone know which tank this is?
seems to be a VT-4 however the turret face ERA is different as is the Hull UFP beak
this is VT2, actually ZTZ96B foreign trade type. compared to VT4, its positioning is lighter weight and cheaper price. but also equipped with the latest aiming system, ammo，remote machine gun and compatible with the 125mm ammunition user group.
VT5 is positioned similarly to it, but it is lighter（foundation） and uses 105mm ammunition.
Interesting photo, VT5 (or ZTQ15？) test GL6 APS system installed（radar）.
