I don’t know, but there shouldn’t be any difficulty in implementing these.
VT-4
Looks much smaller than in game. In game Chinese tanks are quite large despite originating from the T-72. Wonder if the models are actually off dimensionally and are actually indeed larger than they should be.
I wonder if we could ever get the external side fuel tanks modeled for other tanks and not just the VT-4.
Could be wrong, but looks like ZLT11 (at least it the same turret by the looks).
Besides, it isnt APS, it “just” a jammer sweep
did you know if the ZLT 11 can shoot the BTA2 (DTC02-105), they both have a 105 rifle barrel with the ZTQ-15
It’s definitely a ZTL 11
Spoiler
Spoiler
I’m trying to gather information, according to these sites the T-80UD can or has already taken from the BTA4, I don’t know if the values indicated seem better than the 3BM42 ??
and the VT4 is also supposed to have them !
By the way, Pakistan’s newest domestic APFSDS supposedly named Sejjel is an improved 125-II/BTA-4.
It penetrates 620mm of RHA equivalent at 2KM compared to 600mm of original BTA-4.
DTC10-125 is 680mm of RHA equivalent at 2KM, in comparison.
It indeed is a ZTL11 and you are absolutely right, that’s more of a jammer rather than an actual APS
Does anyone know which tank this is?
seems to be a VT-4 however the turret face ERA is different as is the Hull UFP beak
this is VT2, actually ZTZ96B foreign trade type. compared to VT4, its positioning is lighter weight and cheaper price. but also equipped with the latest aiming system, ammo,remote machine gun and compatible with the 125mm ammunition user group.
VT5 is positioned similarly to it, but it is lighter(foundation) and uses 105mm ammunition.
Interesting photo, VT5 (or ZTQ15?) test GL6 APS system installed(radar).
This is VT-5