Kek nice
That round next to the 140mm penetrator is DTW-125 and that projectile is ~642mm long
The 140mm apfsds projectile is like 850mm long and the penetrator is most likely roughly 750-775mm long.
Muzzle velocity is 1810m/s
Penetrator is 5.71kg
Penetration according to L-O
733-755mm @ 0m (0)
687-708mm @ 2000m (0)
—-
400-412mm @ 2000m at 60 degrees
It’s like roughly equivalent to M829A4 in best case scenario
2 Likes
Useful information for me, thx.
Gaijin says that MBT-2000 use FY-2 and FY-4, so they have more reliable source, maybe i need to edit my topic.
FY-4 is probably only used around the cage armor
Does MBT-2000’s first extended composite armor mean that 96/99/99A also has first extended composite armor
DTW-125 projectile being 642mm long (proof)
The VT-2 image you used is actually of the VT-2B
VT-2B got the RCWS, not the base VT-2.
1 Like
Fixed, thx :)
It is worth mentioning that FY-4 has been removed from the dev blog of MBT-2000, and it is now Rank VII.
So i think it will be in 10.3/10.7 now.
1 Like
Is 6TD-2E engine same as 6TD-2?
Export name.
How does the VT-1’s name work? Is MBT-2000 the name assigned by Norinco and VT-1 the name assigned by the PLA, or did VT-1 replace MBT-2000?
MBT-2000 is the only official name, VT1A is said to be the subsequent domestic engine version of MBT-2000, so we speculate that VT1 is the code name for the original MBT2000, If you pursue extreme historical accuracy, they should all be called MBT-2000.
Wikipedia might be wrong then
1 Like
Wikipedia always be wrong :) I’d like that gaijin call all of them MBT-2000.
1 Like
That vehicle is often quoted as being a 140mm gun test bed, but that is in fact false. It is the 1991 WZ123 prototype.
Compare the camouflage colors on the gun barrel, for example. The HMG is also mounted on the cupola, not a separate pillar, and there is no CITV.
To my understanding, MBT-2000 has not been documented with any other designation.
There is a hypothesis that VT1A adds additional ERA to the sides of the turret, but the tanks received by Morocco do not have this and still claimed to be VT1A.
1 Like
Also worth noting that GJB 3659-99 Caliber series for gun of armoured vehicles also lists a 140mm tank gun… and this document was created in 1999.
1 Like
I would imagine it’s the industrial designation, but I cannot be 100% sure.
Correction: After comparing the MBT-2000’s gun to ZPT98 and Type 88C, it looks more like it uses the same gun as the Type 96. This would also make some sense as the Type 90-II/MBT-2000 family was developed before the Type 99, but again, I don’t have hard proof of this.
1 Like