Chengdu J-10, History, Performance & Discussion

I’m pretty sure it’s AESA because there were photos of its ground wreckage after the aerial battle in May, very clearly showing AESA
image
image
image

2 Likes

It’s not AMRAAM-ER.

3 Likes

I was referring to the Meteor

Got no idea what you are on about.

thanks for correct, never known this pod

AESA seeker is a massive advantage in terms of guidance quality, target aquisirion and datalinking.
This is the reason that MDBA and Japan are working together to put the AAM4B seeker onto a Meteor

That was canned

We have missiles in game that should be AESA

What missiles?

Where is it from? I’ve never seen anything about an AMRAAM-ER being air launched

Nevermind

J-10 doesn’t have much to do with Lavi, the rumors still exist due to the J-9 program being underrepresented.





6 Likes

the aerodynamics design. F-35 sacrifice too much for the ability of carrying 2000lb in cabin, the problem is fat not intake.
and to be precise, current non-adjustable DSI is not always better, usually designed for specific speed range(usually around battle speed not top speed), it performs not so good when out of the range. Its benefits are more about stealth and cutting off weight.

1 Like

anyone with a brain knows that, except those cn haters

5 Likes

Looks like j10c will be straight down grade over j10a in terms of flight performance, it’s got same engine and will likely be heavier and less top speed

3 Likes

what are you talking about?

1 Like

Wdym? J-10C uses Al31F series 3, when 10A only AL31FN

The J10C uses WS10Bs dawg

7 Likes

Early aircraft used the AL-31F

none of the J-10Cs constructed after 2021 use AL-31Fs (which is most of them)

3 Likes

Let’s see what happens on the devserver

AL-31FN-3

Early J-10C batches indeed used AL-31FN-3, same as J-10B.