I meant the sides of the belly like this diagram shows. I’ve never seen anything mounted there on an actual plane.
1 Like
though for exhibition
as I said, the smoke would cause some damage to the engine, meaning extra maintenance cost, so usuallt no
1 Like
well usually this is good enough for Gaijin if a report has to be raised.
Considering that gaijin does not add equipment failure in the game, I believe it should be feasible
总结
Does the J-10A in the first img have both the targeting pod for bombs and for anti-radiation missiles?
I think so, the closer one does seem to be a radar receiver.
1 Like
Yeah but still no proof it can mount missiles down there.
Only exists in the principle model stage
for exhibition
so it can carry 250kg LGB on body pylon?
and the pod is mounted on middle pylon, not usual
Now that’s funny
Only appeared at the 2016 Singapore Airshow
good as long as it’s official
1 Like
I hope we get a more modern j10 since at this point we’ve crossed well into 4th gen with advanced avionics like f16c, like hopefully our j10 comes with pl8b pl12s etc
I mean the thing is we don’t get to see so much of PLAAF exercises so they could be using this configuration in other cases and we wouldn’t know, as long as it was shown it should be ok to be implemented.
It seems to me like the early j10 would only be like 12.0 so yeah I really hope they add the j10a first, or at least add the early one before the eurofighter.
I would hope they make a separate line for J10, like separate all the J7s and add more J7s to fill up the J10 line starting from F84, with perhaps F84F as well. The Q5 JH7 line gets moved to bomber line like the Russian tech tree where the Mig27 succeeded the bomber line.
3 Likes
这写的不是AWRAAM-10 吗？还是说AWRAAM的编号不同？
I thought it said AWRAAM-10, which should indicate PL10? OR is this a different naming system?
1 Like
SD10比PL12早，你就想AMRAAM-10这名字和SD10的关系。