Changing out the Finnish F-18C for the later, more capable F/A-18C MLU-2

its also a fighter, so you can now have 2 insane cas planes without the insane increase in SP cost

1 Like

Now that is a better argument lol.

either way the only nation that didnt need it is russia

also ofc russia is the only nation with a proper spaa

yep u just understood the gaijin idea of mother russia…

The more modifications, the better. That way the RP cost per mod is divided and lowered each tier.

Honestly, same can be said for the US though, the F-15E and the new F/A-18C Late are also going to sort of create the same CAS situation.

Not really, the ItO-90M is also bonkers for both France and Sweden.

the ItO-90M isnt even comparable to the Pantsir

the pantsir is so so so much better

also the F-15E and F/A-18C arent that good in cas relative to the Su-34 and Su-30SM

1 Like

As far as i can see you han’t played the Pantsir (and neither have i). But both of us have a ~2:1 K/D in the ItO-90M so you can’t really argue that it’s bad by any means.

i can test drive the pantsir, and i played the ItO mostly when cas wasnt this op

the Pantsir has so much more range in the missles, and it has guns

and even if those 2 things were identical this is the biggest difference:

the yelow line is the pantsir radar, the purple is the ItO 90M, they are not in the same league

1 Like

I think having a second Hornet premium(especially now that sweden recently recieved the JA37Di F21 premium) would not be the best idea, but more modernised hornets with AIM 9X down the line will be necessary (in far future).

I’d like to see the MLU one added after the current C variant

There are 2 MLU versions, you should be a little more specific