Adjusting the value of the- dude, all the numbers are right there lmfao, if i altered anything it would’ve been right there, reducing the tnt filler, changing the strength of the material, its literally all on the receipts here that I specifically didnt do that, because I too am curious of bomber durability and this has just been teaching me that I was right
You are past grasping for straws at this point man, you are genuinely completely out of arguments besides “Its AI hes cheating”
I don’t think the air-2a genie is enough to clear out the mass raids of radioactive posting in this thread, the use of the thermonuclear sky scorcher is required
1, PROVE im altering the data then
2, SO alclad is 2024-T3, but now you’re saying the blenheim didnt use it? so doesnt that just loop back around to my original point of different materials different thickness and different strengths?
You are adjusting the values and making erroneous assumptions about the materials. Or moreover your council of AI’s has gotten itself into a hallucination loop.
This is a diagram of the skin thickness on the B-17. You have applied a value of 2mm as being representative of the average skin thickness of the B-17. There is not a single place in the wing where the skin is 2mm thick.
For the non-Americans out there…2mm converts to .079 inches.
The thickest place is .064 inches and the thinnest is .016 inches.
The average thickness is around .050 inches.
So he is over-stating the thickness of the skin by a factor of around 150% if we just use the ballpark average.
Gaijin doesn’t illustrate fragments really doing anything besides tearing structures apart because there was no real purpose to have incendiary effect on fragmentation.
Because, y’know. A few hits of high explosive fragmentation tore shit apart in-game.
Also, HE isn’t going to catch things on fire. that B-24 got smackaroo’ed dead in it’s fuel tanks and there wasn’t a ginormous plume of fire or anything.
But when forced to be realistic, you’re seeing a lot of the growing pains that’s happening now.
Wow the shit I bitched about on the .50’s thread is rearing it’s head in strange and novel ways! Who would’ve guessed!
they had 12.7cm guns but if I recall, those were destroyed early on and 75mm guns that were more or less just scaled down copies of the german 88mm.
Fuselage? Ill recalculate with 1.6mm, I knew it thinned out as it got away from the center, as ive stated before, but not to that degree. Now thats a genuine mistake