Hi, somehow the new reaload speed was not applied to the KV1 and the Jagtpanzer IV.
Since they have at least the same space for the loader then in the P4 they should be lowerd as well.
With the JP 38(t) ok it´s even more cramped so what ever.
How about you explode instead?
Would not solve the inconsistancy.
But would be nice, I hope it happens to you as well.
Jokes aside, they don’t need the buff. Reload is a balance factor, and neither of these tanks need this buff.
Reload time is not realy about balance but about technical stuff, there BR for balance.
But if today this is a reason for technical changes ok, as long as the gun is the same it should still be similar becouse it is the SAME gun, othervice the game should be renamed acade thunder or WoW.
Devs have literally said it themselves.
If anything, the 75/46 M43 should’ve gotten it, as it uses a license PaK 40 and is very mid
Using the same gun does not automatically require the same reload time across different vehicles. Reloading also depends on ammunition placement, ready-rack design, breech access, loader position, fighting-compartment volume, crew ergonomics and the stage of ammunition used.
War Thunder also treats reload time as a balance parameter, so a difference by itself is not enough to establish a bug. The recent Panzer IV adjustment therefore cannot simply be copied to the KV-1 or Jagdpanzer IV because they use a related 7.5 cm weapon.
The strongest way to argue for a change would be to provide primary-source loading trials, manuals or rate-of-fire data for each specific vehicle and ammunition arrangement. If those sources show a clear discrepancy with the current values, it should be submitted as a vehicle-specific report. The Italian 75/46 M43 would likewise need its own evidence rather than an inference based only on the PaK 40 family.