Talk about fighting in style
4 Likes
+1
1 Like
+1 but only if it has heated seats in the back. /j
2 Likes
+1 For new age R3
I’m convinced the PLA looks at old vehicles and say “but what it we made it goofier”.
1 Like
i think the br should be 5.0 max, otherwise it would suffer in the same way as the U-SH 204. (20mm orlikon with 52mm of pen at 5.3 suffers a lot.)
the point of a vehicle like this would mostly be a glass cannon, because a regular car can’t even withstand regular rifle calibre rounds. this means it can be easily crew wiped with a good mg burst, so putting it at a higher br would still mean a good deal of suffering. it’s also only armed with a 50.cal, meaning putting it at 1.6-2.0 would be reasonable. variants with an autocannon could boost it up a few brs, (3.0?) but any weapon bigger than that likely will never make it onto an SUV.
absolute need
1 Like
+1 would make for a crazy demolition derby if you had a lobby of these things
1 Like
Idea:
this could be really useful if infantry are added.
Honestly if this is added with infantry it could be OP and could also carry infantry
While I enjoy goofy ahh vehicles like Toyotas with ZU-23-2s et al., I shall say -1.
I don’t want to be the one who womps like “boo hoo my immersion” while playing low tiers, but I truly cannot fathom playing my, say, Pz IV or T-34-76 alongside 2020s car fitted with RCWS shooting APDS… I know we already have cases of rather heavy time travelling (looking at you, Swedish TT), but I don’t want to see such level of modernity fighting under those “obsolete” conditions
1 Like
Exactly why I think this should only be added with infantry