Challenger 3 MBT - Technical Data and Discussion

Add on armour on the UFP, Cheeks look thiccer compared to base Cr2, new mantlet design, keeps the bulge over gun, sides seems to have space for armour

1 Like

Ngl was hoping for a more radical turret design this looks like CR2.1 you can tell there is something missing in the breach area and such

1 Like

GPMG mount for loader…no remote weapons gubbins here.

image
without distortion

3 Likes

kinda looks like theres something done to the ufp

Yep, either plate with a nice cover or composite

its thicker by a large margin

1 Like

Am curious but I wonder will they add additional spaced armor to the turret like the leopard 2A6 wedge’s because if you look closely to the picture I’m focus to the top of the mantlet it’s sort of gives a hint that there is additional armor to be added ?? I could obviously be wrong but it looks like it ??

could also be last years one with a fresh coat of paint that theyve been using to test stuff

doubt, granades launchers are there, and look like they will sit there

Also looks like a bit more on the hull around the Driver’s hatch.

There anything on youtube at IAV2024?

hmmm idk its weird cause the ufp look taller, but there wouldnt be space for that. im calling it on this being the prototype theyve been using and the photo is just wacked

nope, its an add on, just like the plates on Cr2,and it is either a plate with a nice cover or a composite block

Doesn’t look like a plate looks like new composite array mounted on the internal plate. You notice it sits higher the and isn’t level with the hull front sides at the top

Dont you trust UK ability to cover plates?
image

yea the whole ufp looks taller. like they decreased slope

Red part looks solid, so it might be a extension of the ufp
Blue part is where the bulge starts


Just like on the BN
image
Something like that is there, but as a monoblock

i mean wtf do they only show it on a tv screen? we need a real photo of it

specially with a measuring tape

oh yea they had to push the headlights to the side cause its too thick lol

it also seems to gain elevation in direction to the drivers hatch

So imo the bock on the UFP will be counted into Farnham, so it will get EPSOM block on the LFP simmilar to DL2F l and above