bruh, I wondered if I should download the game again. but thankfully you guys reminded me why I quit
But this game has such great features like…
4 Likes
so it got the merkava experience
welcome to the club?
1 Like
Just played a match in my base Challenger 2 again, seems like the Premium T-80U-E1, Object 292, PzBtl 123 and Leopard 2A4M CAN spam is out in full force, suddenly the Challenger 2 is feasting on people that can’t aim.
Nice, a Challenger 3 nerf, this is exactly what Britain needed
They could have at least given it a 5 second reload or some mantlet armour, the tank is completely pointless now
I mean, yeah. There is zero point to spawning it really now.
It was stupid to add it in the first place, and it’s gotten no better as time passes.
Can absolutely garentee i will never play the challenger 3TD again, i LOVE the fact they nerf the engine based on the FINALISED challenger 3 specs and not the TECHNICAL DEMONSTRATOR… but don’t give it it’s BLOW OUT PANELS which are preset on the STILL IN PRODUCTION challenger 3 NOT TECHNICAL DEMONSTRATOR. Good job gaijin devs great choice… Really helpful for game balance… And the spaa module change coming in before the helicopter one’s like your cash cow KA50… Mmmm cherry on top…unbelievable
3 Likes
tbh this is an expected and accurate change, although imo it should be the CV12-6A engine
DM63 would be nice tho…
Zero chance I’ll be using it again or any other challenger 2 until the problems are fixed, i find it hilarious how FAST this was changed in comparison to other bug reports.
6 Likes
@Smin1080p Excuse me, can you tell us if there is a decision to downhand the Challenger 3ATD BR. Now the performance of ATD is not enough to support it to stay in 11.7BR.
5 Likes
Well, just tried it post-patch.
Sigh
I won’t even put it in the line up, waste of time using this half baked mess, less protection, no blow out panels, slower reload, same mobility… When i can have a challenger E with better mobility, and BK will an active protection system whilst both are fitted with a turret spall liner and better ammo storage location.
1 Like
6 out of the 7 Challenger 2s are utterly useless, unplayable, and over BR’d now. 2E should be top of the TT
CR2s 11.3 → 11.0
CR3/BN 11.7 → 11.3
10 Likes
because of this their BR is going up more
I wouldn’t be surprised at this point.
What part of “tech demonstrator” does gaijin not understand?
2 Likes
DM53, 2nd best round in the game, on a solid chassis…
@Hartsy1
Ka-50 is currently nerfed into the ground, not sure why you’d bring that up…
This change was also externally reported by a player. Not something Gaijin did on their own.
@花谱_kaf
Challenger 3 still fires DM53, it’s not the worst 11.7, and likely not even in the 5 worst.
First of all, DM53 is not omnipotent. It can’t change the fact that Challenger 3 is the most rubbish. DM53 can’t penetrate any enemy you can see at will. It still needs to carefully aim at the weakness before opening fire. Is it a solid chassis? That’s even more funny. One-third of the effective protection area on the front of the car body is only 500mm KE 11.7BR. Whose ammunition is less than this number? Even the most rubbish L27A1 has 564MM KE.
Since you like to analyze, let’s take a look at the turret of Joke3: hollow gun shield armor + ammunition stored in the tail compartment of the turret + no tail compartment ammunition pressure relief = British manned space rocket.
Even if you go back and compare the 120S of 10.0, you can find that Challenger 3 is garbage in 11.7BR, the same rotten car body protection, the same bad maneuver, but the 120S has 5 seconds to load a M829A1 and has a complete tail compartment pressure relief device, and Challenger 3? Except for the humorous DM53 and the “500mm sturdy chassis” that only looks good on paper, I can’t think of how it is qualified to dare to be higher than 10.7Br.
8 Likes
