I asked smin about this awhile ago and he basically stated that all the changes were implemented when in reality they didn’t
Normally i support and understand smin but that time annoyed me
2 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Vaf23R6g6PcQ
I think this counts in this thread as the CR3TD is actually a Challenger 2 LEP, but gaiijin have accepted my report to give the Challenger 3TD target tracking (air targets only)
As it has a timed fuse shell, this could be really useful against helis and low flying aircraft, it at least gives it a niche compared to the other Challengers
1 Like
well they are prolific lairs a surprise to know one saddly
1 Like
The main change i want is the increase to first stage
1 Like
This isn’t a massive change needed, obviously the vehicle’s performance needs improving, but could we please change the default camo for the OES? It really bothers me that it’s this weird green color that looks like it was intended for an American tank. None of the other Challenger 2s have this standard camo either. Take a look at the original Challenger 2 OES before the camo netting was standardized to fit the camo the vehicle has on.
To me, this looks much better than the current one, especially if you put the condition at 100%. This green + green camo net just doesn’t look right on a Challenger 2. Again, not a massive issue, but I’d like if it could be changed to the one used on the TES and other variants.
1 Like
Okay so I managed to put the CUP varient of the CR2 with the dozer in to a hanger once again to get better pictures. I can also use freecam to explore this model if needed
(The pictures are dark as thats the only way to get around war thunder HDR mess)
Spoiler
Picture shows that they have done some effort to make it compatable with the addon dorchestor armor
There is also a plate behind the dozer that is not present on the base model CR2 which they have also made, this goes right the way down to near the base of the tank
Last picture to show these are new pictures as its next to the sky sabre
3 Likes
Did gaijin provide any reason why this isn’t already in the game?
1 Like
That’s so weird, I didnt notice any issues on the dev server with it when it was present, i cant think of why they’d remove it
2 Likes
I would be nice to get clarity on this from smin or someone
1 Like
I seriously support your words,There are so many things needed to change about UK
You can ping them about it.
But good luck getting anything but lies and convenient excuses.
1 Like
+1 Give chally sum love
Hey. It wasnt properly configured with the DM and was added in error. The 3D model functions.
There is a suggestion open to add the Dozer blade functionality
1 Like
Thank you for the follow-up smin, even though it does leave me with more questions but thats more of a developer side thing haha
Hi Smin,
Are you able to share any news about the Challenger 2s getting their spall liners corrected?
Most notably LFP and hull side spall liners
Cheers
1 Like
Hey
Im afriad there isn’t any current new updates to the open reports to share at the moment
3 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vgonJS3tbCOg
Bug report for the armour addons of the TES/OES to be removeable :)
4 Likes
Would be nice to remove the giant IED jammer on the top as it serves no purpose other than to make the tank more visible