I will do my best
Is one of the sources the British Defence Equipment catalogue?
Yes
Can we ring the telephone number in the book and ask ??? XD
Shouldn’t that count as a primary source because it is essentially just a collection of brochures direct from the equipment’s manufacturer?
Basically all the British defence companies submit their entires and the MOD collate them into a single catalogue for export customers.
Ok, i dont know where you got that, but if i add it there will it be fine?
Already added to the report.
Ok, then im back to scrolling the net untill i find anything usefull
I mean to be fair he’s got the correct strategy for dealing with disappointment
This is how easy bug reporting should be
Easy? I opened 60 new tabs over the course of 10 minutes. Im even in the wayback machine RN
only 60?? you need to bug report the HSTVL XD mission impossible
cant wait for the new fire rate in 2035
Wayback machine sure is usefull
https://web.archive.org/web/20221116032956/https://www.quarryhs.co.uk/miltech.htm
You’d think so
but they’d probably reject it as primary because of something daft like this disclaimer, even though the specs comes from the manufacturers advertising in the catalogue
Which is why I said I wasn’t prepared to write a ticket myself when I only have one source that I consider primary but have to second guess that gaijin agree, and no secondary source that I considered close to reliable.
Well, you just have to catch the chance you have and try. You can also come here to us, we will try our best to help :)
Well, i try to keep the positive attitude as much as i can. But dont think im always like that, even i have bad days :)
@Gunjob here’s another source for RARDEN rate of fire:
Weapon Systems for Lightweight Armoured Fighting Vehicles - Royal Small Arms Factory Brochure: