Yea, Crusader AA mk 2 is what followed me up to a Falcon, and 9 br IR slinger would be cool
What missile it has?
Javelin or Blowpipe (MCLOS / SACLOS)
Stinger (IR)
Also comes with either a 20mm rotary cannon or a 30mm rotary
Going back to it the Radar is in the 100% erect position. It would be nice if we could bring it down to half-mast.

Crusader AA Mk1 is my most played tank last I looked. That was my main spaa until the falcon and still is
my 75% wr in the Olifant mk2 says otherwise lmao the thing is a hidden gem
Oh the Mk.2 is honestly not bad, yeah. Great thermals for its BR but armor is lacking big time. Still an okay pick for a lineup
yeah its pretty good, I dont like the lack of maneuverability but I can work with it.
Eland-90 is used on occasion, for me though I barely used it because the heatfs was just atrocious
G6 was fun but everyone sort of knows it’s over BR’d, especially now with the M109 that is better in literally every single way and is a lower BR.
Sarc line is alright
Concept 3 is pretty good at 4.7
Rooikat MTTD was okayish.
Ratels are interesting but just too bad to be useful, mostly due to size.
Olifants suck.
Never used the TTD because it looked to me like it has no armor at all, even in the cheeks it takes a lucky shot to bounce, plus you’re in near universal uptiers. But in retrospect it’s probably okay due to the speed it has.
I think the SA tree was a neat idea, especially because from what I have read in the past they wanted less copy paste tanks, that’s out of the window, but yeah it’s been a meh bag at best.
We can see how that turned out SA is the only Sub-tree without Copy and paste. Over 90% of Finland is C&P and Hungry gave Italy Soviet C&P.
Oh how wrong this is…
Finland original models: T-72M1, 2A4, 2A6, T-34-85, BT-42, Vickers MkE, T-55M, Fokker DXXI3, B239, VL Pyorremyrsky, Fokker DXXI, Morko Morane, CV30FIN. 13
Copy-paste: T-28, T-34, Pz IV, Charioteer, T-54. Hurricane, BF-109G2, BF-109G6, Vampire, Mig-21Bis, Comet, PT-76. 12
Undecided: J34.
13 unique, 12 copy paste, 1 undecided [has a different engine & can use AIM-9Bs].
At worst that’s 50:50.
Also SA has Eland as copy-paste.
2 leopards that will belong in other trees when added(like wherever the Dutch go). A British tank that is also in the Soviet tree(Vickers MkE). T-34-85 is in 3 tech trees. the only true unique tank to Finland is the BT-42 as the other unique ones don’t even have weapons or engine changed. and neither Hungry nor SA have brought in Air vehicles at this point.
It’s not a Dutch 2A6, it’s a Finnish one. Same with the 2A4.
No, Vickers MkE isn’t in the Soviet tree, the T-26 is a Soviet made derivative.
T-34-85 with that hull only exists in Sweden’s tech tree.
Eland is copy-paste still BTW.
“In January 2014, Finland agreed with the Netherlands to purchase 100 used Leopard 2A6NL tanks for approximately €200 million”
The 2A6s are the NL version. The Dutch leopard. is why there is a Dutch skin form that one on the marketplace
The one we have is the Finnish one after the purchase.
So it wouldn’t ever be removed.
When did I say it would be removed I just showed you it was a Dutch leopard and is the one that is C&P.
Also, I just looked at every T-34-85 it’s identical to the Russian one just without addon armour(tracks a modification to most tanks in the first place. and wouldn’t been seen even on the Russian on 24/7) and external fuel tanks(an external visual decoration) neither of these things makes it unique.
There is no 2A6 in War Thunder with the Finnish tank model, so no it’s not copy-paste.
Finnish T-34-85 lacks the external fuel tanks and a number of other tiny hull details that all other T-34-85s have.
And those things make it objectively a unique model.
Copy-paste means identical, not similar identical.
Dose that make the Canada tree here unique then? do to 90% needing a new model. under your own words:
Finland is 90% shared equipment but Canada is not unique? By your logic for Canada Finland is not unique. A T-34-85 without weapon or engine is still a T-34-85 same tank you can find in Russia or China


