Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion

Missed this, congratulations.

British Engineers really are ingenious. I promise. For all the wrong reasons of course.

image
Found this regarding the Romor A Eras performance

This side even has the patent for it

3 Likes

Time to buff romor

1 Like

@Gunjob would gajin, accept such a table? It’s also in the Haynes manual for Chally 1. I mean since gajin thinks the ERA of the TES has the same protection it should be increased as well

Snail modells up to tes using values they gave to VARMA, the blocks on the side of Cr1 mk 3

So varma has the same performance as Romor in game? That’s fun

Romor
image
VARMA
image

1 Like

Ahh okay I remembered wrongly

Also im not sure what series the varma is, as that also changes the protection it should provide

1 Like

What armor starts do the NERA protection blocks for the lower front plate have? Is it similar to Varma or is it its own thing? (In game of course irl they are different)

You mean this?
image

2 Likes

Yes

Starts with 2F late, it is Dorchester, so a better Chobham (the thing inside Cr1 cheeks and hull)

2 Likes

Okay so it is its own thing, I suspected the snail was lazy and would’ve just copy pasted the varma values onto it too

Well, VARMA Series 1 protects from RPG-7 and 30mm apds so…

2 Likes

Ah yes “protection from 30mm APDS” nice one gajin

2 Likes

I think it’s better to at this point ask what values for the different armour packages are not wrong? XD

1 Like

Yea
Warrior
image
BMP 3
image
QN
image
VCC 80
image
Puma
image
Bushmaser 2
image

2 Likes