Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

its been reported dw, same for warrior

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lXLijPeRPADV

In before they go doesn’t provide protection figure so denied

I wonder if Cr2 spall liners will go anywhere

Well im in a picke. I tried hard to find some 2H 2I equipped Challys, but all i can find have the 40mm plate, so i wont be able to prove it

it should do, we have more than enough info now


2 Likes

ahhh i get what they mean, so they are saying the bit at the back that makes it look thicker is also a dust shield

It’s laughable that they modelled the plates on the turret sides as structural steel lmaoooo

i mean, thats what they are, weight plates for a planned era kit most likely using aspro like on the hull…

Yea, they say that thicc part is the cover
Even tho the 200 block is attached to it

I dont know any more if the plate is 40,65, 100,110 or whatever else the value is

Might be able to re-jig the report for cr1/2 side armour because it’s protection offered was 60mm KE and 300mm CE

Meanwhile:

-Russian ERA mountings on the hull: High hardness rolled armour.
-NATO ERA mountings: Structural steel.

6 Likes

Decided to look for it just for the sake of looking for it to calm myself, well knowing i will find nothing. And i was not dissapointed. I found a whole 0

might want to update your bug list btw

@Fireball_2020 you want to add to your report the Cr3 plate?
image
image

1 Like

done

1 Like

Chally wet dream
image
HAAIP in action

will probably be short lived icl, i’d probably sleep better at night with it being 1217hp, 62.5 tonnes, and having improved traverse(and of course spall liner).