Oh, right
1 Like
Thank god I’m just sleepless anyway, otherwise i’d be at the point of thinking about that at night
I mean how do you get that wrong. I just want to know
1 Like
jesus, thats a lot of words
2 Likes
Doing the lords work, gods speed Brother
For those who like visuals, here’s the forum version with embedded images: Challenger 2 Blog inaccuracies
When they misrepresent my work, present false research and sign my name off on it, while also making so many mistakes - It’s hard to keep it brief…
3 Likes
Thanks, but this is more of a response to the blog than a bug report. Please be sure to stick to one issue per report, otherwise it becomes too convoluted, things get missed and more confusion happens. If you could please split it into the individual issues and focus the sources on one at a time.
A report of this size and complexity is only likely to lead to a further miscommunication.
So just fragment it into their own individual bug reports? I’m happy to just cut and paste into new reports if that’s what you’re after
2 Likes
7 Likes
Remember to post all the issues please,so we can upvote .
no im talking about literal holes in the composite of the turret cheecks. its also strange how every other tank composite looks and has no holes but the challenger is somewhat different.
I will, don’t worry lol
I didn’t forfeit my afternoon for Gaijin, for it to sit on the dusty Challenger 2 shelf
3 Likes
Yes please, but also focusing on just the issue, whats wrong and whats to correct + evidence. Right now it reads as a response to the blog or a “bug report” of the blog itself. Irrespective of the blog, if these are issues or not, they should each be their own topic, addressing specifically the matter at hand and attached with the relevant sources.
Its not all required immediately and I appreciate feelings are high and in the moment, but it may be best to just focus on one at a time. Huge reports like this are only likely to cause more confusion.
7 Likes
Okay no worries man. I’ll get to that now and ping them on to you when i’m done. Shouldn’t take too long :)
Appreciate your help, Smin
8 Likes
Silly question perhaps but why is the “Composite screen” backing onto the ASPRO-HMT plates in the armor view half the size of it’s actual dimensions?
See right at the top? it’s exactly half of the actual dimensions of the plate. If this is steel, surely the entire plate should be armor?
1 Like
That was the change they did with last update, because our everybody’s favourite Trixxter was of the oppinon that it is a 40mm “Dust Cover” so he single handedly pushed the change with a bit of “pixelcounting”
and of course to prove him wrong we need sources… a thing that he didnt need
6 Likes