Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Yea, i just looked at the BN photo in the moring and i saw a plate on in. That was my trying to prove it is there


That janes video did have this picture in, thought it was interesting and it might help anybody with mantle suggestions?

Well, it just shows what we know, that the sloped thing is empty inside adn the flat plate behid it is the real armor

My Bad, tbh I thought you were insane xD

Tbh i too started to think i am XD I should belive in myslef more

alright
well if I thought this was bad, im gonna risk looking at the hells that are the manpads and DU hull threads

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/kOtJ2XcRIwvF

5 Likes

Hollow steel box to run cables to the drivers forward camera in the middle?

Thanks :)

IMG_1130
Opening my browser seeing this and knowing I’m not going near that cesspool.

3 Likes

Summary is basically:
‘Gaijin sucks’
‘You are NATO propagandist’
‘Nooooo you are russian propagandist’

Then one or two people actually posting evidence

1 Like

Can we get this camo as as a GE unlockable on all our Challengers please

it is pretty clear Russian BiasTM in their explanation.

2 Likes

It’s pretty much a gish gallop.

hmmm, i’ll see if i can replicate.

i’m not even go into that mess. It’s bad enough trying to argue the Stormer is fundamentally broken whilst someone else is whinging about how it’s OP because it can bash a T series tank by hitting the optics.

4 Likes

Oh no, your missile can do funky stuff due to over pressure. Proceeds to kill an mbt by doing said funky stuff with their own atgm? It’s all swings and roundabouts and we’re all stuck on gaijins wild ride.

1 Like

It’s not a ATGM though

I think this camo is on the base Cr2 as a marketplace skin

Perhaps it depends on the shell fired at the ammo? It shouldnt but who knows