Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Is it about this?
image

3 Likes

Did the devs make any comment on the front dorchester blcoks having different protection for the 2F and TES?

so no news at the moment

1 Like

pahahahahahahahahahaha who could’ve seen that one coming.

on a serious note, that’s seriously bad news. hell, the Ariete got mentioned.

currently its about as clear as brick wall.
room for improvement mayhaps?

Gaijin: “We have fixed a number of bugs so far”

The bugs they’ve fixed:

5 Likes

Smoke coming out the wrong hole affected my gameplay sooo much, how about you guys? I’m so happy.

1 Like

and the transmission even though their is no difference

I hate the change. Now i cant impersonate the steam locomotive in my Cr2

2 Likes

Does anybody know who provided the GCE for challenger 2 BN?

I think it’s MOOG or SAFRAN, but i cant seem to find any hard specs for their actuator systems

Nope

This doesnt fill me with much hope they are going to look at the big reports

5 Likes

Sorry for the shitty screenshot I’m on my phone.

1 Like

image
U sure?


My WT crashed XD

2 Likes

One of the reports he mentions is this one:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gBEhhxT7M3Ue

so I think its “fixed in a future version” that bug report hasnt even been updated yet

Well, it is a mix of fixed and will be fixed, but
image
The floor dm location got fixed

With how the thread linked above is going, I expect them to replace ch2’s mantlet with egg boxes instead of armour.

What they are doing to the abrams and the justification they use for the 7AV are, quite frankly, a joke.

1 Like