I’d take even a 50-100mm pen nerf if made you impossible to ammorack, you’d still have more pen than L27A1 lmao
Yeah, exactly.
They haven’t used wet storage since the CR 1 since it was found to be ineffective, it was replaced
If Gaijin thinks the CR2 is actually worse than other nations’ MBTs, or that they can’t fix it properly due to a lack of detailed information, then at the very least they should adjust its BR — not 11.7 or 12.7.
CR2 armour against drones has proven to be very capable. Based on crew feedback
Challenger is exports may not have a great track record but let’s face it.
Everybody only wants us for our armor.
1 Like
Wanted. Everyone is now making their own domestic versions and variants
Additionally, the ammo in the hull is arrayed over such a large area that it rivals the Russian T-80 carrousels
2 Likes
if we’re honest unexplodable ammo will be the biggest buff any tank could get
It halves the methods of dying, to only crew, or lack thereof
1 Like
bring back chieftain
Dont even go there, did you see how they removed all my comments questioning the additions in the patch
1 Like
Tbe CR3TD in game is an abomination which i cannot bring myself to actually play.
5 games, one of which a T55Am1 fired through my breach into the ammo and nuked mr 😂
1 Like
so same as the CR2?
1 Like
Cr2 its nit usually as bad
They deleting posts relating to the L27A1 where questions are asked and their nonsense is called out💀😂
2 Likes
To be fair, I’d be embarrassed if I’d tried to use the games protection analysis to try and disprove a primary source document as well.
It was… hilarious and quite sad.
1 Like
Tried? They are still trying.
1 Like
The CR2 survivability is nowhere near as bad as the CR3 imo - the CR2 turret can take a hit in the turret, you either lose your loader or you lose your commander/gunner
The CR3 is driving around with an unexploded bomb behind the loader with (as far as im aware but may be wrong) weaker turret armour - any hit that goes past the right side of the gun (as you’re looking at it) is going to one shot you
1 Like
I dont even consider it as a proper vehicle ingame, its actually embrassing that gaijin even keeps it as it is
If it was my choice I’d have it removed from the game entirely now we have the new Abrams.
Just save the Challenger 3 name and hype for the actual Challenger 3.
5 Likes
At a minimum it needs to be remaned to the Challenger 2 LEP
2 Likes