Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 2)

Did it get accepted?

I don’t remember I forget things now I’m getting old 😭😂

All good lol, I couldn’t find yours but it seems that Fireball made a similar report

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aIZAZitXNYnx

2 years and left to rot, classic gaijin

2 Likes

The hull side armor is probably similar to the abrams hull side armor with the additional plate being the same thickness as the base hull side plate.

1 Like

Possible to create a new thread of all the bug reports that have been accepted / ignored, listed in 1 clear coherent list so that it gets some attention?

Already made by @Morvran. I can’t seem to find it though.

Yeah the link dosen’t seem to work anymore, I think it got removed? I dont know why

Slightly outdated, I’ve but here’s the main bit and a few others that need to be added

1 Example being the Challenger 2s having the Wrong Gear Ratios

10 Likes

Salute you for your work

3 Likes

Awesome on the rounds performance, so the only reason they don’t make it better is because they intend for bias.

It get’s old playing with machines that don’t work correctly. Even the TES and OES NERA side armour behaves like ERA that doesn’t work instead of NERA. Why can’t we have anything fun?

1 Like