Nope
Sorry for the shitty screenshot I’m on my phone.
1 Like
One of the reports he mentions is this one:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gBEhhxT7M3Ue
so I think its “fixed in a future version” that bug report hasnt even been updated yet
Well, it is a mix of fixed and will be fixed, but
The floor dm location got fixed
With how the thread linked above is going, I expect them to replace ch2’s mantlet with egg boxes instead of armour.
What they are doing to the abrams and the justification they use for the 7AV are, quite frankly, a joke.
1 Like
If the Challenger 2 still has mobility issues, can anyone submit additional bug reports for it. I dont have time at the moment
wait whats the difference? It looks exactly the same as before on both TES and OES, only difference I see is OES is missing dust cover modeled. Im a bit lost
Also updated the mantlet report internally with some more consise and accurate information.
Should be looking at about 560mm on the top 2/3 of the mantlet, and 570mm on the bottom 2/3.
1 Like
ohh its in the xray, ok thanks
1 Like
I wish they would change the description as 40-60mm implies it’s only 40 or 60mm and not 2 plates of 40 and 60mm with an air gap between.
1 Like
agreed.
Maybe we’ll get that at some point.
Can i just say only 50% would be the weld as both steel plates would have a small 45° chamfer for the weld to sit in/built up in, you wouldn’t weld two plates together with both edges at 90° for 2 reasons, 1. The welds wouldn’t be strong 2, the welds wouldn’t sit flush to the surface with that much build up. .
Here’s a basic example
5 Likes