We are simply too dumb to understand gaijins logic. Only they can balance the game as they are completely unbiased in their opinions and only they can make fair and balanced decisions on our part otherwise the game would be one sided.
1 Like
we now have a “DUST COVER” with the same thickness of the prior side plate
then the visual model with the THICKER PLATE and 40mm plate in the armour viewer…
i honestly lost hope
Maybe google translate read “fix the challenger” as british for “kill the challenger”
That is because the side screen is covered by a dust cover, you can see it here at 65mm of dust cover
or so the snails say. Ignore that 200mm composite block is attached to the composite screen cover, because why not?. Also what is the point of COVERING THE COMPOSITE SCREEN? like, why cover it?
same reasoning as MUH the crew wears PPE so no SIDE SPALL LINER
snails and logic apperantly are 2 seperate entities
what
thats their reasoning: crew wears kevlar so no spall liners in the hull sides
And if you wonder
This pic used to measure
and the pic used by gaijin
Are not TES. They are OES, and 2 out of the 3 versions of OES. If you wonder, yes, there are different composite screens depending on the armor package.
Proof they are different tanks
I could be misremembering but I think there’s no side spall liner cause we don’t have any photos that show one, and we were speculating that it might not have been an issue for the MoD because the crew are issued Kevlar vests instead
I was about to say, neither of those have the ASPRO HMT Pack
HOW ARE THEY VALID SOURCES SNAIL, TELL ME
1 Like
Yes
a trixxters world
could we try to make another bug report based on the other picture
There is no point. They do not understand the point that there are different versions of the tank and using the one that is not it is wrong, and we decided to leave it be untill beter pics surface.
maybe we can ask @Gunjob to do a internal report, they at least have to hear to a moderators reasoning
Well, do what you want, im tired of this. I already did a spacius research with others on this or one of the others cr2 topics, if you find it you can use it
here i found it for you, it starts around here, but there is at least 300msg to read
This “logic” applied by gaijin genuinely makes me cringe.
If the tank they’re using for the TES we have in game is permanently attached to ATDU, which, I’m going to take the fairly liberal step and say it is.
Er, how did they not pick up on the registration of each tank.
I get its a kit that could in theory be fitted to any Chally 2 tank, but still.
yeah i know, i was part of that 300msg XD
So estimates (circa 1978? 0 degrees, RHAe, 2000m):
BM23 - 430mm
BM85(???) - 480mm
Further developments - 540mm
You were, well i forgot with whom i talked. Feel free to use whatever was posted.
1 Like