Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

A storage im making rn, no meaning

@Legwolf i see you try your shots again with the side armor
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/yAwckdJcmHwD

1 Like

One of the photos on the site shows this

1 Like

¯_(ツ)_/¯ it’s blatantly wrong, not even a suggestion, it’s just an omission of fact.
There’s no way 2F and TES share the same values. Even more, they got it right when the tank was first introduced!! This used to have great protection, but was nerfed later when someone eroniously tried to get it to STANAG 6 and Smin reported the ERA was getting changed to generic ERA and 30/400

4 Likes

of only this shot had the whole block at th bottom, it would be all easier, as we could check how thicc is the plate in the thicc version of side backplate


you got a bit but its an OES

yea, that is the shot i meant but is this
image
an outer side just at the left? the brownish one. if so we can pixel measure it

Yes you can see the seem line at the edge id the photo


image

Yea but i need the front the perspective makes it hard if not impossibel to take a good measure


Ok am i a madman for having a thought to compare the smoke granade to the side plate?

1 Like

we play the british so yes, we are insane

354da6226a4f1f9711fba05c7f713d4594569d79
we do know B the thickness of the eralier NERA blocks, we do know A the triangular armor plate with add on NERA bolted onto it, we know that the backingplate C plus the NERA B is equal to the running gear protection D. Cant we make anything with this work?

i mean they are 66mm right?

yeas they are, but i need a PERFECT shot for it to work

image
This was posted on this thread a bit ago, maybe itll help again now

yeah thats the triangular plate with nera armor added

it shows 200 mm

the upper B=D= 200 mm the lower B is B-N

Do we know the thickness of the ERA blocks?