Here’s the 0 thickness parts, went from 2 down to 1. Presumably these would have an associated armour thickness value to catch shrapnel etc.
New:
Spoiler
Old:
Spoiler
Has the breach armour being the wrong way around and the way the trunions slot into it been reported?
No it hasn’t been reported because the guys which are the most active in this thread think that the ‘‘mantlet hole’’ face the outside. We need to wait for those guys to express their opinion on the matter.
view from inside the tech demo, diferent gun though
Spoiler
Errr the pin gaps go all the way through?
We don’t actually know whether it has trunions for mounting do this idea hadn’t actually been considered until now, it’s certainly an attractive model I’m just not sure yet.
Yes it was, at least twice.
do you know if theres a plate like the one on the 3td? that would make it missing and that prolly some more armour
wow nice find.
its actually insane how long the gun is
I will not make the joke.
I will not make the joke.
I will not make the joke.
1 Like
-_- ok then
hmm?
First when the picture of the rotor was posted here(or another Cr2 thread) and 2nd time recently
ahhh well of course, its simple to disprove, the screws match the mount shown on the challenger 2 with it’s gun pointed up, therefore the pins must be on the forward side.
Yea, they are a match, another thing we would need to find is if the same screws are on the inside (hard to figure out)
I personally doubt it but its not impossible
hmm?
the possibility of the same screws being on the inside is low but not 0 as far as we know.
Well, some screws are there
Spoiler
