Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

If the material is really changed to aluminum, will KE be improved?

Enforcer and Enforcer 2 are identical when it comes to weapon mounting, so it does not matter

Depends. But it should not matter as it should be steel

1 Like

Yeah, at least EA are only motivated by greed, and don’t have other ulterior motives/biases.

is the source that states its Aluminium a primary source?

If getting it was so easy we would have given it. Sadly bearly anyone care about the backplate material and no one mentions it.

I haven’t seen the devs research into this.

1 Like

Could you not find a enforcer on a different vehicle with the GMC?
image

Right but we have one secondary source already. I’m just trying to help you guys get this one over the line. If there is another book that mentions its steel that’s all we need.

3 Likes

Suprise, its HMG

idk man. @warhead_beast @duckmartin anything?

I’ll lock the report again, poke me if you find something.

Sure thing, but i will be out for a few hours so someone else will need to do so.

1 Like

So leonardo confirm it can hold the 40mm gmc so therefore the challenger can hold it so it should get the option to along with the .50 cal
Screenshot_20240118_105651_Samsung Notes

Yes, the manufacturer and secondary sources state so. But nu uh

Is this okay?

Can you link me the report?

That is what we used.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1jSgt1dXofUi
Sure, but Gunjob noted to me that only 12.7 will be passed