Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Yeah this is ridiculous, no doubt you will make another one, be asked for even more sources then have the post locked again

Another question couldn’t the plate we see just be the backing plate of the VARMA mk.6 the one we saw at the start of telic?
image
That one

That plates are plates we are missing rn, they are independent from the big backplate that also have the block at the bottom
image

At this point I’d have more trust and faith in EA doing a better job than what gaijin are doing.

The only actual good thing about this game is the graphics engine.

The modelling of penetration is problematic, the armour model is very problematic, the suspension, gearbox and drivetrain modelling is sub-par. Atgm modelling is abysmal, SAM modelling is best not discussing as it’s just laughable. All that really leaves is the graphics which are good.

honestly I find it funny how much gaijin fucks up and I bet their “improvements” will most likely nerf the challenger 2 and not actually fix any of the issues

@Legwolf could you add this:



From this source to your report about the steel back plate

Bug report; where CR2 Grenade Machine Gun

a 50cal would be more useful

GMG would be more fun!

There are whole 0 pictures with it mounted. It is a if scenario
image

I will make it my life’s work to find such pictures before admitting they do not exist.

I failed, but good luck
You are looking for L134A1

Can you link the report so I can unlock so you can add more source materials.

SR(L)4026

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/POJj1VwLKZRk

Thank you, I just found your bug report on HMG and GMG.

Yep, it sure it there

Unlocked. @warhead_beast the locking still allows the author to contribute. Can you let me know when you’ve added your bit and I’ll lock it again.

Me about to post the sources there and steal the fame from warhead

1 Like

image
this is more what you are looking for