Also I find it a funny practice to first request more info but then lock the conversation so that no more info can be added
Also apperantly the “pixel counting” part was deleted after.
@Gunjob are technical moderators allowed to reject reports because they have a different personal understanding of the matter at hand? Because “This is a dust cover” and showing two photos where two different baseplates with varing thicknesses are shown without any sources or further elaboration really shouldn’t the requirement for rejecting a bug report.
6 Likes
I know it was already talked about but here i bring it once again
The sideplate is split into 4 sections, Driver, 2 crew compatrtment and engine
Pic with only p1 and p4 mounted
The measure was made based on the front part
But as can be seen, the front has a fender part that does not allow for mounting armor close to it
so it has a space there. It has been like that since early DL
Where they had to prepare a special frame so it will fit with the fender (labeled 1)
So we cant say for sure that the whole plate is 40, just like we cant say for sure it is over 40
The thing that would thorw some light on it is Holder that can be seen next to slat, looking like it is on 3rd drive wheel
Sadly the perspecive makes it hard to make out how much extended it is, as it looks like it is far over the slats, and that would not be possible.
I’m currently more about how reports are treated by technical moderators because as we can see by the two reports made there seems to be some kind of problem with having a proper argument about it or getting the devs to look further into it
1 Like
Question is does it line up with the side plate of the engine deck
Or would it create a bump like we see on the thicker side paltes
Not sure, but probably a bump, no Cr2 mounted a single plane plate afaik. CRARRV did tho
It isn’t going to be corrected, they are just going to write a few blogs and say it’s fixed when nothing has really changed.
Nothing ever really changes. I’ve lost all hope. I dream a western company will buy War Thunder. So much wasted potential.
4 Likes
Yeah this is ridiculous, no doubt you will make another one, be asked for even more sources then have the post locked again
Another question couldn’t the plate we see just be the backing plate of the VARMA mk.6 the one we saw at the start of telic?
That one
That plates are plates we are missing rn, they are independent from the big backplate that also have the block at the bottom
At this point I’d have more trust and faith in EA doing a better job than what gaijin are doing.
The only actual good thing about this game is the graphics engine.
The modelling of penetration is problematic, the armour model is very problematic, the suspension, gearbox and drivetrain modelling is sub-par. Atgm modelling is abysmal, SAM modelling is best not discussing as it’s just laughable. All that really leaves is the graphics which are good.
honestly I find it funny how much gaijin fucks up and I bet their “improvements” will most likely nerf the challenger 2 and not actually fix any of the issues
Bug report; where CR2 Grenade Machine Gun
a 50cal would be more useful
GMG would be more fun!
There are whole 0 pictures with it mounted. It is a if scenario
I will make it my life’s work to find such pictures before admitting they do not exist.
Can you link the report so I can unlock so you can add more source materials.
SR(L)4026