When it gets worked on.
HUH
I know that in datamine they got the blindspot reduced but now it make sense, i was not expecting that
6 Likes
Neither was I, lucky you.
2 Likes
guess that shows they really are going over old reports
1 Like
First there was no armour, best armour, now no source, best source
Yea, hope it continues
They also changer ENFORCER ammo count to 200 and reduced total from 1700 to 1600. The loss of a total ammo is not that bad, what im sad is they get normal 200 mags instead of extended 400, just like OES got extended 200 instead of normal 100
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DZaFn3ZfEkkC
There’s no way this can be the case for ASPRO-HMT. It’s used across so many different vehicles, varying from MRAP to MBT and everything in between. The data sheet on ASPRO-HMT exclusively mentions the bricks performance, no mention of backing plates or vehicles.
I would trust it saying the ERA can do XYZ at face value rather than assuming that there was some special conditions involved to reach that STANAG requirement.
They should give the OES extended 400, maybe people will buy it that way.
OES has extended mag.
Rafaels Spec sheet for ASPRO-HMT explicitly mentions it can defeat RPGs. Given this is a 2008 era armor addon, the RPG-7s main Anti-Tank round since 1988 was the PG-7VR, a tandem warhead round.
Its unlikely they’re advertising a 2008 era ERA as only stopping a 1950s era RPG round as the PG-7VL
1 Like
Ok i misunderstood what you meant :)
They should definitely give at least the OES the option to change the weapon though, premiums should be special, adding a 20~mm plate to the turret is not special.
All challengers with the rws should get a choice between 7.62 and .50, maybe OES gets exclusive 40mm grenades
I think the justification lies in its multi-tiered defence as Fireball explained. First is the explosive/ERA to destroy the breaching charge then a passive behind it to catch the warhead proper.
It never happend, but
3 Likes
That sounds odd to me. The add-on armour could be mounted to any number of different vehicles with different base armour.
Therefore it would make sense to me for the STANAG rating to apply solely to the add-on armour. For example if they include the Challenger 2 base armour in the STANAG level 5 rating then the add-on may not achieve STANAG level 5 when fitted to an armoured car.
7 Likes
Afaik that also never happend. If it ever did, it would mount L134A1, but there are no photos nor written sources.
Exactly. The data sheet can’t be grabbing values from certain vehicles or mounts as its userbase simply varies too much in protection.
1 Like
checks tech trees
Yep all historically accurate here…
We are not going down that road
